PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMDL vs. BABA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and BABA is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

AMDL vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-86.59%
49.35%
AMDL
BABA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMDL:

-0.76

BABA:

1.25

Sortino Ratio

AMDL:

-1.40

BABA:

1.89

Omega Ratio

AMDL:

0.83

BABA:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

AMDL:

-0.91

BABA:

0.74

Martin Ratio

AMDL:

-1.64

BABA:

3.66

Ulcer Index

AMDL:

49.33%

BABA:

15.77%

Daily Std Dev

AMDL:

106.96%

BABA:

46.10%

Max Drawdown

AMDL:

-88.63%

BABA:

-80.09%

Current Drawdown

AMDL:

-86.59%

BABA:

-64.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a -55.35% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's 28.40% return.


AMDL

YTD

-55.35%

1M

-39.68%

6M

-74.70%

1Y

-75.97%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BABA

YTD

28.40%

1M

-20.48%

6M

6.29%

1Y

58.97%

5Y*

-12.14%

10Y*

3.10%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMDL vs. BABA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMDL is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMDL is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMDL is 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMDL is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMDL is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMDL is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BABA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BABA is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BABA is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BABA is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BABA is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BABA is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BABA is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMDL vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMDL, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
AMDL: -0.76
BABA: 1.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMDL, currently valued at -1.40, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
AMDL: -1.40
BABA: 1.89
The chart of Omega ratio for AMDL, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
AMDL: 0.83
BABA: 1.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMDL, currently valued at -0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
AMDL: -0.91
BABA: 1.77
The chart of Martin ratio for AMDL, currently valued at -1.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
AMDL: -1.64
BABA: 3.66

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and BABA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50Mar 23Tue 25Thu 27Sat 29Mon 31Wed 02Fri 04Apr 06Tue 08Thu 10Sat 12Mon 14Wed 16
-0.76
1.25
AMDL
BABA

Dividends

AMDL vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM20242023
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
0.61%0.78%1.29%

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and BABA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-86.59%
-26.22%
AMDL
BABA

Volatility

AMDL vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a higher volatility of 59.90% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 19.13%. This indicates that AMDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
59.90%
19.13%
AMDL
BABA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab