AMBP vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMBP or ET.
Performance
AMBP vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBP achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 35.81% return.
AMBP
2.50%
-14.62%
-5.59%
6.74%
N/A
N/A
ET
35.81%
7.35%
12.60%
38.63%
19.22%
2.15%
Fundamentals
| AMBP | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.21B | $58.38B |
| EPS | -$0.12 | $1.36 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.85B | $83.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $530.00M | $14.03B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $633.00M | $12.39B |
Key characteristics
| AMBP | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.32 | 2.55 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.67 | 3.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.09 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.16 | 1.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.17 | 21.05 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.28% | 1.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 33.86% | 15.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.71% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -61.86% | -0.06% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between AMBP and ET is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMBP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMBP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
AMBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than ET's 7.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMBP Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. | 11.05% | 10.42% | 6.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.38% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
AMBP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBP drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMBP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.27%. This indicates that AMBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMBP vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities