PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMBP vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMBP and ET is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.2

Performance

AMBP vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-66.11%
151.76%
AMBP
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMBP:

-0.30

ET:

0.91

Sortino Ratio

AMBP:

-0.19

ET:

1.32

Omega Ratio

AMBP:

0.98

ET:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

AMBP:

-0.15

ET:

0.95

Martin Ratio

AMBP:

-0.55

ET:

3.89

Ulcer Index

AMBP:

19.45%

ET:

5.97%

Daily Std Dev

AMBP:

36.04%

ET:

25.44%

Max Drawdown

AMBP:

-75.71%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

AMBP:

-70.35%

ET:

-16.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBP:

$1.58B

ET:

$59.26B

EPS

AMBP:

-$0.05

ET:

$1.28

PS Ratio

AMBP:

0.32

ET:

0.72

PB Ratio

AMBP:

94.32

ET:

1.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBP:

$3.77B

ET:

$61.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBP:

$479.00M

ET:

$10.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBP:

$521.00M

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBP achieves a -9.01% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -10.41% return.


AMBP

YTD

-9.01%

1M

-8.33%

6M

-29.10%

1Y

-14.08%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-10.41%

1M

-7.55%

6M

8.44%

1Y

22.16%

5Y*

34.58%

10Y*

1.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMBP vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMBP is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMBP is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMBP is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMBP is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMBP is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMBP is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMBP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBP, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
AMBP: -0.39
ET: 0.91
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBP, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
AMBP: -0.34
ET: 1.32
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBP, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
AMBP: 0.96
ET: 1.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBP, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
AMBP: -0.19
ET: 0.95
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBP, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
AMBP: -0.72
ET: 3.89

The current AMBP Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBP and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.39
0.91
AMBP
ET

Dividends

AMBP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

AMBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.15%, more than ET's 7.45% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
15.15%13.29%10.42%6.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.45%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

AMBP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBP drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-70.35%
-16.75%
AMBP
ET

Volatility

AMBP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) is 11.88%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 15.30%. This indicates that AMBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.88%
15.30%
AMBP
ET

Financials

AMBP vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab