PortfoliosLab logo
AMBP vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMBP and ET is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AMBP vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-52.21%
153.17%
AMBP
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMBP:

0.09

ET:

0.56

Sortino Ratio

AMBP:

0.59

ET:

0.97

Omega Ratio

AMBP:

1.07

ET:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

AMBP:

0.07

ET:

0.65

Martin Ratio

AMBP:

0.25

ET:

2.13

Ulcer Index

AMBP:

19.90%

ET:

7.51%

Daily Std Dev

AMBP:

46.74%

ET:

27.32%

Max Drawdown

AMBP:

-75.71%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

AMBP:

-58.19%

ET:

-16.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMBP:

$2.18B

ET:

$57.20B

EPS

AMBP:

-$0.04

ET:

$1.28

PS Ratio

AMBP:

0.43

ET:

0.67

PB Ratio

AMBP:

94.32

ET:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBP:

$5.04B

ET:

$61.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBP:

$629.00M

ET:

$10.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBP:

$591.00M

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBP achieves a 28.29% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -9.89% return.


AMBP

YTD

28.29%

1M

43.15%

6M

5.82%

1Y

4.01%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-9.89%

1M

10.99%

6M

3.30%

1Y

15.15%

5Y*

28.06%

10Y*

1.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMBP vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMBP is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMBP is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMBP is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMBP is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMBP is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMBP is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMBP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AMBP Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBP and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.08
0.56
AMBP
ET

Dividends

AMBP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

AMBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.81%, more than ET's 9.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
13.81%13.29%10.42%6.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
9.29%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

AMBP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBP drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBP and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-58.19%
-16.26%
AMBP
ET

Volatility

AMBP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) has a higher volatility of 28.01% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 12.80%. This indicates that AMBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
28.01%
12.80%
AMBP
ET

Financials

AMBP vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
1.27B
19.54B
(AMBP) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBP vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
11.8%
21.0%
(AMBP) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
AMBP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. reported a gross profit of 150.00M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.10B and revenue of 19.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

AMBP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. reported an operating income of 41.00M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.28B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

AMBP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. reported a net income of -5.00M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.