AMBP vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMBP or ET.
Key characteristics
AMBP | ET | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -9.12% | 15.14% |
1Y Return | -2.62% | 41.71% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -25.69% | 35.72% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.03 | 2.91 |
Daily Std Dev | 44.52% | 15.22% |
Max Drawdown | -75.71% | -87.81% |
Current Drawdown | -66.19% | -7.37% |
Fundamentals
AMBP | ET | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $2.04B | $52.40B |
EPS | -$0.12 | $1.09 |
PE Ratio | 0.00 | 14.28 |
Revenue (TTM) | $4.81B | $78.59B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $593.00M | $13.42B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $588.00M | $12.69B |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBP and ET is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AMBP vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMBP achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 15.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMBP vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. | -0.03 | ||||
Energy Transfer LP | 2.91 |
Dividends
AMBP vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
AMBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.80%, more than ET's 8.01% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. | 11.80% | 10.42% | 6.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Energy Transfer LP | 8.01% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
AMBP vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBP drawdown since its inception was -75.71%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for AMBP and ET
Volatility
AMBP vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.10%. This indicates that AMBP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.