PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMBA vs. FTEC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AMBA and FTEC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AMBA vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
35.94%
6.96%
AMBA
FTEC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMBA:

0.85

FTEC:

1.34

Sortino Ratio

AMBA:

1.50

FTEC:

1.82

Omega Ratio

AMBA:

1.18

FTEC:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

AMBA:

0.52

FTEC:

1.91

Martin Ratio

AMBA:

2.94

FTEC:

6.74

Ulcer Index

AMBA:

14.35%

FTEC:

4.31%

Daily Std Dev

AMBA:

49.86%

FTEC:

21.78%

Max Drawdown

AMBA:

-81.65%

FTEC:

-34.95%

Current Drawdown

AMBA:

-63.95%

FTEC:

-4.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBA achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than FTEC's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBA has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 3.32%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 20.83% annualized return.


AMBA

YTD

7.48%

1M

5.89%

6M

35.94%

1Y

44.56%

5Y*

4.53%

10Y*

3.32%

FTEC

YTD

-0.51%

1M

-3.86%

6M

6.96%

1Y

29.81%

5Y*

20.13%

10Y*

20.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMBA vs. FTEC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMBA is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMBA is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMBA is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTEC is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTEC is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTEC is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTEC is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTEC is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTEC is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMBA vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.851.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.501.82
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.521.91
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.002.946.74
AMBA
FTEC

The current AMBA Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBA and FTEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.85
1.34
AMBA
FTEC

Dividends

AMBA vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.49%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%1.09%

Drawdowns

AMBA vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBA drawdown since its inception was -81.65%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBA and FTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-63.95%
-4.48%
AMBA
FTEC

Volatility

AMBA vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 6.71%. This indicates that AMBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.73%
6.71%
AMBA
FTEC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab