AMAT vs. QLD

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a -16.48% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -24.41% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 21.41%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 25.09% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is lower than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and QLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than QLD's 0.30% yield.

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, roughly equal to the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 11.90%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 18.58%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.