PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAPX vs. FDFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAPX achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than FDFIX's 9.64% return.


AMAPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.46%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.18%

FDFIX

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.64%
6M
8.63%
1Y
25.08%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
0.26%5.98%3.77%2.09%-5.27%0.49%5.35%6.61%0.08%1.69%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
9.64%17.59%25.06%26.27%-18.10%28.69%18.46%31.47%-4.45%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAPX and FDFIX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.07

Over the past year, AMAPX and FDFIX have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMAPX vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAPX
AMAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AMAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMAPXFDFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.38

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.95

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

12.98

-7.99

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAPX and FDFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAPX drawdown since its inception was -7.75%, smaller than the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAPX and FDFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAPXFDFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.75%

-33.77%

+26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-8.99%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.63%

-18.76%

+16.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.75%

-24.51%

+16.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.70%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-4.56%

+3.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

2.03%

-1.24%

Volatility

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amana Participation Fund (AMAPX) is 1.21%, while Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that AMAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMAPXFDFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

4.81%

-3.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

10.00%

-7.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

12.64%

-10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.19%

17.05%

-14.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.01%

18.59%

-16.58%

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAPX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMAPX vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

AMAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FDFIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AMAPX
Amana Participation Fund
3.66%3.52%3.15%2.25%1.30%1.55%1.95%2.45%2.62%2.14%2.14%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.50%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMAPX and FDFIX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFIX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to AMAPX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAPX dropped -7.75% vs FDFIX's -33.77%.

FDFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMAPX and FDFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer