AMANX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMANX (Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - AMANX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Amana, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, AMANX returned 11.22%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMANX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund (AMANX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMANX achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

AMANX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 6.58%
• YTD: 11.71%
• 6M: 11.17%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 16.26%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMANX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund	11.71%	16.41%	12.85%	13.60%	-8.86%	22.53%	13.98%	25.31%	-5.17%	20.91%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AMANX and FSPGX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.77

The correlation between AMANX and FSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMANX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMANX

AMANX Risk / Return Rank: 43
AMANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AMANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMANX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
AMANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
AMANX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund (AMANX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMANX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.85	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	2.50	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.32	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	1.76	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.83	5.90	+2.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMANX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMANX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMANX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.85	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.75	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.90	-0.27

Drawdowns

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMANX drawdown since its inception was -37.82%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMANX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMANX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.82%	-32.66%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-16.17%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-23.32%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.19%	-32.66%	+13.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.00%	-6.37%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	4.81%	-2.01%

Volatility

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund (AMANX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 3.39% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMANX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.39%	3.32%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	11.58%	-1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	15.39%	-3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.92%	21.49%	-7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	21.55%	-5.61%

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMANX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMANX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

AMANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMANX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Income Fund	4.84%	5.39%	5.69%	5.24%	8.14%	4.66%	6.53%	7.81%	6.55%	5.75%	4.15%	6.88%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMANX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

AMANX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMANX or FSPGX?

AMANX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to FSPGX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMANX dropped -37.82% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.