AMAGX vs. TMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).
AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019.
Performance
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 4.73% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.14% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than TMDV's 4.14% return.
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAGX vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank
AMAGX
TMDV
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAGX | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.35 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 0.61 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.49 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 1.42 | +7.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAGX | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.35 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.31 | +0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAGX and TMDV is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison
AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.63% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and TMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAGX | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -33.42% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -10.52% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -17.11% | -10.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -6.91% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -5.42% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.65% | -0.81% |
Volatility
AMAGX vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison
Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) has a higher volatility of 7.18% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.78%. This indicates that AMAGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAGX | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 3.78% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 8.35% | +4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 14.86% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 14.43% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 18.78% | -0.47% |