AMAGX vs. MVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV).
AMAGX is managed by Amana. It was launched on Feb 3, 1994. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006.
Performance
AMAGX vs. MVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMAGX vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | -3.22% | 17.62% | 15.73% | 25.67% | -19.49% | 31.51% | 32.93% | 33.09% | 2.47% | 28.91% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAGX achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAGX has outperformed MVV with an annualized return of 15.74%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.
AMAGX
- 1D
- 3.57%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.74%
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMAGX vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMAGX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than MVV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMAGX vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank
AMAGX
MVV
AMAGX vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMAGX | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.57 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.09 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 0.97 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 3.72 | +4.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMAGX | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.57 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.10 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.29 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.24 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAGX and MVV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMAGX vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison
AMAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAGX Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.95% | 0.65% | 3.64% | 0.52% | 5.44% | 3.15% | 3.47% | 10.90% | 13.67% | 7.45% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
AMAGX vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAGX drawdown since its inception was -57.64%, smaller than the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAGX and MVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAGX | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.64% | -85.54% | +27.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -26.85% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -45.53% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.09% | -69.19% | +41.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -11.34% | +3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -20.70% | +10.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 6.97% | -4.13% |
Volatility
AMAGX vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amana Mutual Funds Trust Growth Fund (AMAGX) is 7.18%, while ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that AMAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMAGX | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 12.99% | -5.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 24.02% | -11.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 43.30% | -22.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 39.66% | -21.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 42.32% | -24.01% |