ALTM vs. LIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT).
LIT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALTM or LIT.
Correlation
The correlation between ALTM and LIT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ALTM vs. LIT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALTM:
0.16
LIT:
-0.11
ALTM:
0.96
LIT:
0.08
ALTM:
1.11
LIT:
1.01
ALTM:
0.18
LIT:
-0.06
ALTM:
0.42
LIT:
-0.28
ALTM:
28.86%
LIT:
12.67%
ALTM:
73.83%
LIT:
32.52%
ALTM:
-68.21%
LIT:
-62.61%
ALTM:
-19.27%
LIT:
-56.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTM achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's -0.71% return.
ALTM
11.89%
8.92%
100.70%
22.65%
N/A
N/A
LIT
-0.71%
-0.47%
8.92%
0.84%
5.46%
7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALTM vs. LIT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALTM
LIT
ALTM vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALTM vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison
ALTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTM Arcadium Lithium plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 0.99% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 1.85% | 2.52% | 3.26% | 2.15% | 0.24% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
ALTM vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTM drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTM and LIT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALTM vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison
Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 5.95%. This indicates that ALTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.