PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ALTM vs. ICLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ALTM and ICLN is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

ALTM vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-16.35%
-23.17%
ALTM
ICLN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALTM:

0.16

ICLN:

-0.71

Sortino Ratio

ALTM:

0.96

ICLN:

-0.88

Omega Ratio

ALTM:

1.11

ICLN:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

ALTM:

0.18

ICLN:

-0.24

Martin Ratio

ALTM:

0.42

ICLN:

-1.41

Ulcer Index

ALTM:

28.86%

ICLN:

11.77%

Daily Std Dev

ALTM:

73.83%

ICLN:

23.46%

Max Drawdown

ALTM:

-68.21%

ICLN:

-87.11%

Current Drawdown

ALTM:

-19.27%

ICLN:

-69.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALTM achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than ICLN's -0.09% return.


ALTM

YTD

11.89%

1M

8.92%

6M

100.70%

1Y

22.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ICLN

YTD

-0.09%

1M

-2.40%

6M

-17.64%

1Y

-17.34%

5Y*

-1.07%

10Y*

2.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALTM vs. ICLN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICLN is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICLN is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICLN is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICLN is 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALTM vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALTM, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.16-0.71
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALTM, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.96-0.88
The chart of Omega ratio for ALTM, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.110.90
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALTM, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.18-0.65
The chart of Martin ratio for ALTM, currently valued at 0.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.000.42-1.41
ALTM
ICLN

The current ALTM Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALTM and ICLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20Wed 08Fri 10Jan 12Tue 14Thu 16Sat 18Mon 20Wed 22Fri 24Jan 26Tue 28Thu 30
0.16
-0.71
ALTM
ICLN

Dividends

ALTM vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

ALTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.85%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%2.83%

Drawdowns

ALTM vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALTM drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTM and ICLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.27%
-23.37%
ALTM
ICLN

Volatility

ALTM vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 6.12%. This indicates that ALTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.21%
6.12%
ALTM
ICLN
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab