ALTM vs. ALBA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALTM or ALBA.L.
Correlation
The correlation between ALTM and ALBA.L is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALTM:
0.16
ALBA.L:
-0.94
ALTM:
0.96
ALBA.L:
-1.61
ALTM:
1.11
ALBA.L:
0.67
ALTM:
0.18
ALBA.L:
-0.75
ALTM:
0.42
ALBA.L:
-1.40
ALTM:
28.86%
ALBA.L:
53.76%
ALTM:
73.83%
ALBA.L:
79.85%
ALTM:
-68.21%
ALBA.L:
-99.82%
ALTM:
-19.27%
ALBA.L:
-99.80%
Fundamentals
ALTM:
$6.17B
ALBA.L:
£2.57M
ALTM:
$0.18
ALBA.L:
£0.00
ALTM:
1.07
ALBA.L:
0.00
ALTM:
$239.21M
ALBA.L:
-£6.00K
ALTM:
$196.10M
ALBA.L:
-£483.00K
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALTM achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than ALBA.L's -0.00% return.
ALTM
11.89%
8.92%
100.70%
22.65%
N/A
N/A
ALBA.L
-0.00%
-0.00%
-37.33%
-75.26%
-27.85%
-21.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALTM vs. ALBA.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALTM
ALBA.L
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALTM nor ALBA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTM drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum ALBA.L drawdown of -99.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTM and ALBA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) is 8.21%, while Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) has a volatility of 14.17%. This indicates that ALTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALBA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALTM vs. ALBA.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcadium Lithium plc and Alba Mineral Resources. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities