ALTM vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALTM or ALB.
Correlation
The correlation between ALTM and ALB is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ALTM vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALTM:
76.59%
ALB:
57.70%
ALTM:
-68.21%
ALB:
-77.22%
ALTM:
-30.10%
ALB:
-71.87%
Fundamentals
ALTM:
$5.47B
ALB:
$11.47B
ALTM:
$0.18
ALB:
-$16.76
ALTM:
0.97
ALB:
8.89
ALTM:
$936.61M
ALB:
$6.50B
ALTM:
$285.88M
ALB:
-$769.26M
ALTM:
$261.10M
ALB:
-$2.03B
Returns By Period
ALTM
N/A
-6.05%
49.70%
N/A
N/A
N/A
ALB
-37.30%
-17.37%
-6.68%
-39.65%
5.46%
5.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALTM vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
ALTM vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
ALTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTM Arcadium Lithium plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 1.80% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.02% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% | 1.83% | 1.51% |
Drawdowns
ALTM vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALTM drawdown since its inception was -68.21%, smaller than the maximum ALB drawdown of -77.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALTM and ALB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALTM vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) is 6.40%, while Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a volatility of 13.97%. This indicates that ALTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALTM vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcadium Lithium plc and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities