PortfoliosLab logo
ALTM vs. ALB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALTM and ALB is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ALTM vs. ALB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALTM:

$6.29B

ALB:

$7.24B

EPS

ALTM:

$0.09

ALB:

-$11.12

PEG Ratio

ALTM:

1.09

ALB:

0.99

PS Ratio

ALTM:

6.24

ALB:

1.42

PB Ratio

ALTM:

1.00

ALB:

0.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALTM:

$746.60M

ALB:

$5.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALTM:

$124.50M

ALB:

$179.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALTM:

$46.70M

ALB:

-$811.95M

Returns By Period


ALTM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ALB

YTD

-27.73%

1M

9.16%

6M

-39.25%

1Y

-52.12%

5Y*

1.84%

10Y*

1.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALTM vs. ALB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALTM vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ALTM vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison

ALTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
2.61%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%

Drawdowns

ALTM vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

ALTM vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...

Financials

ALTM vs. ALB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arcadium Lithium plc and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
289.00M
1.08B
(ALTM) Total Revenue
(ALB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALTM vs. ALB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Arcadium Lithium plc and Albemarle Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
15.8%
14.5%
(ALTM) Gross Margin
(ALB) Gross Margin
ALTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcadium Lithium plc reported a gross profit of 45.60M and revenue of 289.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

ALB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported a gross profit of 156.30M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.

ALTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcadium Lithium plc reported an operating income of -34.50M and revenue of 289.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -11.9%.

ALB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported an operating income of 19.76M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

ALTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Arcadium Lithium plc reported a net income of -14.20M and revenue of 289.00M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.

ALB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Albemarle Corporation reported a net income of 41.35M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.