PortfoliosLab logo
ALT vs. BLNK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALT and BLNK is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ALT vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALT:

-0.36

BLNK:

-1.03

Sortino Ratio

ALT:

0.12

BLNK:

-2.07

Omega Ratio

ALT:

1.01

BLNK:

0.78

Calmar Ratio

ALT:

-0.23

BLNK:

-0.77

Martin Ratio

ALT:

-0.77

BLNK:

-1.33

Ulcer Index

ALT:

29.53%

BLNK:

57.66%

Daily Std Dev

ALT:

81.26%

BLNK:

75.45%

Max Drawdown

ALT:

-99.94%

BLNK:

-98.91%

Current Drawdown

ALT:

-99.80%

BLNK:

-98.83%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALT:

$429.87M

BLNK:

$73.07M

EPS

ALT:

-$1.26

BLNK:

-$1.99

PS Ratio

ALT:

21.49K

BLNK:

0.67

PB Ratio

ALT:

3.02

BLNK:

0.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALT:

$20.00K

BLNK:

$108.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALT:

-$46.00K

BLNK:

$16.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALT:

-$92.34M

BLNK:

-$133.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALT achieves a -26.49% return, which is significantly higher than BLNK's -48.82% return.


ALT

YTD

-26.49%

1M

-8.15%

6M

-40.11%

1Y

-29.43%

3Y*

-0.87%

5Y*

-8.65%

10Y*

-37.00%

BLNK

YTD

-48.82%

1M

-5.02%

6M

-56.09%

1Y

-77.13%

3Y*

-64.43%

5Y*

-17.75%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Altimmune, Inc.

Blink Charging Co.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALT vs. BLNK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALT is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALT is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALT is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALT is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALT is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALT is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLNK is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLNK is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLNK is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLNK is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLNK is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLNK is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALT vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ALT Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is higher than the BLNK Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALT and BLNK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ALT vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALT nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
ALT
Altimmune, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.87%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ALT vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNK drawdown of -98.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALT and BLNK.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ALT vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison

Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) has a higher volatility of 23.45% compared to Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) at 20.53%. This indicates that ALT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ALT vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altimmune, Inc. and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20212022202320242025
5.00K
20.75M
(ALT) Total Revenue
(BLNK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items