ALT vs. BLNK
ALT (Altimmune, Inc.) and BLNK (Blink Charging Co.) are both stocks. ALT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while BLNK operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, ALT returned -20.72%/yr vs -56.84%/yr for BLNK. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ALT vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALT achieves a -21.33% return, which is significantly higher than BLNK's -22.49% return.
ALT
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -10.13%
- 6M
- -49.29%
- YTD
- -21.33%
- 1Y
- -21.33%
- 3Y*
- -3.60%
- 5Y*
- -20.72%
- 10Y*
- -29.17%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.35%
BLNK
- 1D
- 5.51%
- 1M
- -17.69%
- 6M
- -27.18%
- YTD
- -22.49%
- 1Y
- -45.63%
- 3Y*
- -56.64%
- 5Y*
- -56.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.41M | $12.19M | $11.44M | |
| $761.98K | $662.38K | $1.54M |
ALT vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT Altimmune, Inc. | -21.33% | -49.93% | -35.91% | -31.61% | 79.59% | -18.79% | 496.83% | -8.25% | -95.42% |
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | -22.49% | -52.01% | -59.00% | -69.10% | -58.62% | -37.99% | 2,198.39% | 8.14% | -80.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALT and BLNK is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2018 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
ALT:
$250.65M
BLNK:
$61.70M
ALT:
-$0.87
BLNK:
-$0.60
ALT:
8.27K
BLNK:
0.61
ALT:
1.24
BLNK:
1.37
ALT:
$36.00K
BLNK:
$103.40M
ALT:
-$14.92M
BLNK:
$24.62M
ALT:
-$93.48M
BLNK:
-$58.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALT vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank
ALT
BLNK
ALT vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.96 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | -0.58 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | -0.79 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALT vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALT drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALT and BLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -99.23% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.09% | -81.20% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.25% | -93.15% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.45% | -99.00% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | -99.15% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -79.02% | -73.87% | -5.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.45% | 59.76% | -25.31% |
Volatility
ALT vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) is 12.15%, while Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) has a volatility of 19.92%. This indicates that ALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 19.92% | -7.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.11% | 57.82% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.95% | 93.91% | -24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.48% | 83.14% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.74% | 120.61% | +29.13% |
Dividends
ALT vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither ALT nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALT Altimmune, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1,462.31% |
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALT vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Altimmune, Inc. and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ALT and BLNK have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNK has higher volatility (19.92%) compared to ALT (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALT dropped -99.63% vs BLNK's -99.23%.
ALT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALT and BLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer