ALT vs. BLNK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK).

Performance

ALT vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALT vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ALT Altimmune, Inc.	-14.68%	-49.93%	-35.91%	-31.61%	79.59%	-18.79%	496.83%	-8.25%	-95.10%
BLNK Blink Charging Co.	-15.01%	-52.01%	-59.00%	-69.10%	-58.62%	-37.99%	2,198.39%	8.14%	-79.79%

Fundamentals

EPS ALT : -$0.97 BLNK : -$0.75
PS Ratio ALT : 6.80K BLNK : 0.39
Total Revenue (TTM) ALT : $41.00K BLNK : $103.52M
Gross Profit (TTM) ALT : -$14.95M BLNK : $25.50M
EBITDA (TTM) ALT : -$89.46M BLNK : -$54.80M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ALT having a -14.68% return and BLNK slightly lower at -15.01%.

ALT

• 1D: 6.94%
• 1M: -28.54%
• YTD: -14.68%
• 6M: -18.30%
• 1Y: -38.40%
• 3Y*: -9.96%
• 5Y*: -26.13%
• 10Y*: -40.86%

BLNK

• 1D: 13.06%
• 1M: -14.26%
• YTD: -15.01%
• 6M: -65.43%
• 1Y: -38.23%
• 3Y*: -59.68%
• 5Y*: -57.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALT vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALT

ALT Risk / Return Rank: 26
ALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ALT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
ALT Martin Ratio Rank: 24

BLNK

BLNK Risk / Return Rank: 27
BLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
BLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
BLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 29
BLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALT vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALT	BLNK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.41	-0.40	-0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	-0.08	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.99	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	-0.49	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.02	-0.90	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALT vs. BLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALT Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is comparable to the BLNK Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALT and BLNK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALT	BLNK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.41	-0.40	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	-0.70	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	-0.23	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between ALT and BLNK is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALT vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALT nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALT vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALT drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALT and BLNK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALT	BLNK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.94%	-99.17%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.65%	-79.94%	+17.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.45%	-98.93%	+8.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.89%	-99.07%	-0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.66%	-72.46%	-8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.12%	43.99%	-2.87%

Volatility

ALT vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) is 26.59%, while Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) has a volatility of 31.32%. This indicates that ALT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALT	BLNK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.59%	31.32%	-4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.39%	70.56%	-12.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.96%	94.94%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.38%	82.73%	+11.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	142.47%	121.98%	+20.49%

Financials