ALSN vs. XPEL
ALSN (Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.) and XPEL (XPEL, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Parts industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, ALSN returned 17.78%/yr vs 46.17%/yr for XPEL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALSN vs. XPEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALSN achieves a 24.33% return, which is significantly higher than XPEL's -8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ALSN has underperformed XPEL with an annualized return of 17.78%, while XPEL has yielded a comparatively higher 46.17% annualized return.
ALSN
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 10.24%
- YTD
- 24.33%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 32.56%
- 5Y*
- 27.28%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
XPEL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- -8.25%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 26.67%
- 3Y*
- -17.04%
- 5Y*
- -12.53%
- 10Y*
- 46.17%
ALSN vs. XPEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSN Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. | 24.33% | -8.34% | 88.02% | 42.31% | 16.85% | -14.08% | -9.08% | 11.50% | 3.34% | 29.90% |
XPEL XPEL, Inc. | -8.25% | 24.96% | -25.83% | -10.34% | -12.04% | 32.43% | 251.95% | 140.10% | 335.82% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSN and XPEL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, ALSN and XPEL have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ALSN:
$8.58
XPEL:
$1.91
ALSN:
14.11
XPEL:
23.92
ALSN:
0.81
XPEL:
1.67
ALSN:
2.10
XPEL:
2.59
ALSN:
$3.65B
XPEL:
$489.75M
ALSN:
$1.49B
XPEL:
$208.35M
ALSN:
$926.00M
XPEL:
$78.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSN vs. XPEL — Risk / Return Rank
ALSN
XPEL
ALSN vs. XPEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) and XPEL, Inc. (XPEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALSN | XPEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 0.84 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 1.94 | +1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALSN vs. XPEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSN drawdown since its inception was -48.67%, smaller than the maximum XPEL drawdown of -99.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSN and XPEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSN | XPEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.67% | -99.44% | +50.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -31.79% | +11.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | -71.47% | +37.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.59% | -75.62% | +42.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.67% | -75.62% | +26.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.72% | -54.84% | +44.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -52.41% | +39.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.85% | 13.75% | -3.90% |
Volatility
ALSN vs. XPEL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is 8.67%, while XPEL, Inc. (XPEL) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that ALSN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSN | XPEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.67% | 9.17% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 29.57% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.01% | 40.23% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 54.73% | -25.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.82% | 63.43% | -33.61% |
Dividends
ALSN vs. XPEL - Dividend Comparison
ALSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while XPEL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSN Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. | 0.92% | 1.10% | 0.93% | 1.58% | 2.02% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 1.78% | 2.32% |
XPEL XPEL, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ALSN vs. XPEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. and XPEL, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALSN vs. XPEL - Profitability Comparison
ALSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 406.00M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
XPEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.23M and revenue of 117.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.7%.
ALSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 195.00M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
XPEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.01M and revenue of 117.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
ALSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 112.00M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
XPEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPEL, Inc. reported a net income of 10.35M and revenue of 117.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALSN and XPEL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPEL has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to ALSN (8.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSN dropped -48.67% vs XPEL's -99.44%.
ALSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALSN and XPEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer