ALSN vs. F
ALSN (Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.) and F (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — ALSN in Auto Parts, F in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, ALSN returned 16.99%/yr vs 7.26%/yr for F. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ALSN vs. F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ALSN having a 17.58% return and F slightly higher at 17.75%. Over the past 10 years, ALSN has outperformed F with an annualized return of 16.99%, while F has yielded a comparatively lower 7.26% annualized return.
ALSN
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 25.80%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.64%
F
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.58M | $162.62M | $135.41M | |
| $936.56M | $781.81M | $926.29M |
ALSN vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSN Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. | 17.58% | -8.34% | 88.02% | 42.31% | 16.85% | -14.08% | -9.08% | 11.50% | 3.34% | 29.90% |
F Ford Motor Company | 17.75% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSN and F is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2012 | 0.47 |
The correlation between ALSN and F shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALSN:
$9.50B
F:
$58.54B
ALSN:
$9.69
F:
-$1.84
ALSN:
1.76
F:
0.31
ALSN:
$3.65B
F:
$187.97B
ALSN:
$1.49B
F:
$20.25B
ALSN:
$926.00M
F:
-$907.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSN vs. F — Risk / Return Rank
ALSN
F
ALSN vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALSN | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.85 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.36 | 3.96 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALSN vs. F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSN drawdown since its inception was -48.67%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSN and F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSN | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.67% | -97.07% | +48.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.38% | -23.39% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.59% | -36.51% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.59% | -58.62% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.67% | -64.77% | +16.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | -33.40% | +17.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -44.68% | +31.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.54% | 10.89% | -2.35% |
Volatility
ALSN vs. F - Volatility Comparison
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) and Ford Motor Company (F) have volatilities of 8.44% and 8.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSN | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 8.28% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.90% | 29.76% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.52% | 37.38% | -7.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.51% | 39.35% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 37.42% | -7.53% |
Dividends
ALSN vs. F - Dividend Comparison
ALSN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than F's 6.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSN Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. | 0.98% | 1.10% | 0.93% | 1.58% | 2.02% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 1.78% | 2.32% |
F Ford Motor Company | 6.85% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
Financials
ALSN vs. F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALSN vs. F - Profitability Comparison
ALSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 406.00M and revenue of 1.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 6.08B and revenue of 48.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.
ALSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 195.00M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 638.00M and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
ALSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 112.00M and revenue of 1.41B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of -1.33B and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALSN and F have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSN has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to F (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSN dropped -48.67% vs F's -97.07%.
F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALSN and F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer