ALRM vs. RNG
ALRM (Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.) and RNG (RingCentral, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Application industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, ALRM returned 6.75%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for RNG. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ALRM vs. RNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALRM achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 93.23% return. Over the past 10 years, ALRM has underperformed RNG with an annualized return of 6.75%, while RNG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
ALRM
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 12.24%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 1Y
- 1.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.18%
- 5Y*
- -8.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.75%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.69%
RNG
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- 39.02%
- 6M
- 115.63%
- YTD
- 93.23%
- 1Y
- 136.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- -26.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.55M | $22.53M | $24.88M | |
| $166.64M | $110.87M | $87.41M |
ALRM vs. RNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. | 7.31% | -16.09% | -5.91% | 30.60% | -41.66% | -18.02% | 140.75% | -17.16% | 37.40% | 35.64% |
RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 93.23% | -17.51% | 3.12% | -4.10% | -81.10% | -50.56% | 124.68% | 104.60% | 70.33% | 134.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALRM and RNG is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2015 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ALRM and RNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ALRM:
$2.71B
RNG:
$4.80B
ALRM:
$2.24
RNG:
$1.25
ALRM:
24.39
RNG:
44.65
ALRM:
3.01
RNG:
1.91
ALRM:
$1.04B
RNG:
$2.58B
ALRM:
$729.34M
RNG:
$1.86B
ALRM:
$212.83M
RNG:
$300.06M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALRM vs. RNG — Risk / Return Rank
ALRM
RNG
ALRM vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALRM | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.33 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 4.08 | -4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 9.42 | -9.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALRM vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALRM drawdown since its inception was -60.88%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRM and RNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALRM | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.88% | -95.15% | +34.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.79% | -29.32% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.34% | -48.57% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.33% | -92.36% | +39.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.88% | -95.15% | +34.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.16% | -87.41% | +38.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.57% | -42.86% | +14.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.57% | 12.69% | +4.88% |
Volatility
ALRM vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) is 8.47%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 28.56%. This indicates that ALRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALRM | RNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.47% | 28.56% | -20.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.79% | 59.45% | -34.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.70% | 75.16% | -43.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 64.53% | -30.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.42% | 56.51% | -19.09% |
Dividends
ALRM vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison
ALRM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% |
RNG RingCentral, Inc. | 0.27% |
Financials
ALRM vs. RNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALRM vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison
ALRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.30M and revenue of 265.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.5%.
RNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 472.31M and revenue of 657.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
ALRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 31.64M and revenue of 265.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
RNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.29M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.
ALRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 23.58M and revenue of 265.19M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
RNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of 39.12M and revenue of 657.01M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALRM and RNG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNG has higher volatility (28.56%) compared to ALRM (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALRM dropped -60.88% vs RNG's -95.15%.
RNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALRM and RNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer