PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ALRM vs. RNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ALRMRNG
YTD Return-7.26%8.22%
1Y Return2.25%20.82%
3Y Return (Ann)-10.55%-48.34%
5Y Return (Ann)6.32%-26.46%
Sharpe Ratio0.110.70
Sortino Ratio0.381.25
Omega Ratio1.041.16
Calmar Ratio0.060.34
Martin Ratio0.202.41
Ulcer Index15.78%13.29%
Daily Std Dev29.15%45.99%
Max Drawdown-57.92%-94.29%
Current Drawdown-44.35%-91.71%

Fundamentals


ALRMRNG
Market Cap$3.03B$3.28B
EPS$2.01-$1.05
PEG Ratio1.540.36
Total Revenue (TTM)$923.82M$2.36B
Gross Profit (TTM)$647.30M$1.66B
EBITDA (TTM)$163.43M-$148.49M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ALRM and RNG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ALRM vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ALRM achieves a -7.26% return, which is significantly lower than RNG's 8.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.97%
0.44%
ALRM
RNG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALRM vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALRM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 0.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.06
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.20
RNG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RNG, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for RNG, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.25
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for RNG, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.16
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for RNG, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for RNG, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.41

ALRM vs. RNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALRM Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALRM and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.11
0.70
ALRM
RNG

Dividends

ALRM vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALRM nor RNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALRM vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRM drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -94.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRM and RNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-44.35%
-91.71%
ALRM
RNG

Volatility

ALRM vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) at 10.63%. This indicates that ALRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.27%
10.63%
ALRM
RNG

Financials

ALRM vs. RNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items