PortfoliosLab logo
ALRM vs. RNG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALRM and RNG is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

ALRM vs. RNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
222.69%
35.68%
ALRM
RNG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALRM:

-0.61

RNG:

-0.28

Sortino Ratio

ALRM:

-0.76

RNG:

-0.10

Omega Ratio

ALRM:

0.91

RNG:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

ALRM:

-0.33

RNG:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

ALRM:

-1.08

RNG:

-0.58

Ulcer Index

ALRM:

16.73%

RNG:

22.02%

Daily Std Dev

ALRM:

29.71%

RNG:

46.50%

Max Drawdown

ALRM:

-57.92%

RNG:

-95.15%

Current Drawdown

ALRM:

-49.42%

RNG:

-94.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALRM:

$2.67B

RNG:

$2.26B

EPS

ALRM:

$2.29

RNG:

-$0.63

PEG Ratio

ALRM:

1.54

RNG:

0.24

PS Ratio

ALRM:

2.83

RNG:

0.96

PB Ratio

ALRM:

3.66

RNG:

102.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALRM:

$716.54M

RNG:

$2.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALRM:

$459.83M

RNG:

$1.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALRM:

$134.35M

RNG:

$214.90M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALRM achieves a -10.41% return, which is significantly higher than RNG's -26.25% return.


ALRM

YTD

-10.41%

1M

-2.30%

6M

1.97%

1Y

-19.60%

5Y*

5.44%

10Y*

N/A

RNG

YTD

-26.25%

1M

-0.15%

6M

-29.16%

1Y

-15.23%

5Y*

-34.80%

10Y*

4.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALRM vs. RNG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALRM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALRM is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALRM is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALRM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALRM is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALRM is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALRM is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RNG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNG is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNG is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNG is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNG is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNG is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNG is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALRM vs. RNG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) and RingCentral, Inc. (RNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALRM, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
ALRM: -0.61
RNG: -0.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALRM, currently valued at -0.76, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
ALRM: -0.76
RNG: -0.10
The chart of Omega ratio for ALRM, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
ALRM: 0.91
RNG: 0.99
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALRM, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
ALRM: -0.33
RNG: -0.13
The chart of Martin ratio for ALRM, currently valued at -1.08, compared to the broader market-40.00-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.00
ALRM: -1.08
RNG: -0.58

The current ALRM Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the RNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALRM and RNG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.61
-0.28
ALRM
RNG

Dividends

ALRM vs. RNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALRM nor RNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ALRM vs. RNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALRM drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, smaller than the maximum RNG drawdown of -95.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALRM and RNG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-90.00%-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-49.42%
-94.18%
ALRM
RNG

Volatility

ALRM vs. RNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) is 11.95%, while RingCentral, Inc. (RNG) has a volatility of 19.52%. This indicates that ALRM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.95%
19.52%
ALRM
RNG

Financials

ALRM vs. RNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
242.24M
614.51M
(ALRM) Total Revenue
(RNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALRM vs. RNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20212022202320242025
65.5%
71.0%
(ALRM) Gross Margin
(RNG) Gross Margin
ALRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 158.64M and revenue of 242.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.
RNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a gross profit of 436.34M and revenue of 614.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.0%.
ALRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.86M and revenue of 242.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.
RNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.64M and revenue of 614.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
ALRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 30.33M and revenue of 242.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
RNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, RingCentral, Inc. reported a net income of -7.19M and revenue of 614.51M, resulting in a net margin of -1.2%.