PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALG vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALG vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -10.24% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 9.82%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.


ALG

1D
-1.73%
1M
-10.32%
YTD
-10.24%
6M
-9.01%
1Y
-25.72%
3Y*
-5.05%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
9.82%

MSFT

1D
-3.17%
1M
3.54%
YTD
-11.24%
6M
-10.15%
1Y
-6.96%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALG vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
-10.24%-9.12%-11.07%49.19%-3.27%7.09%10.41%63.18%-31.19%49.01%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-11.24%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between ALG and MSFT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 1993

0.20

The correlation between ALG and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALG:

$1.82B

MSFT:

$3.18T

EPS

ALG:

$8.37

MSFT:

$16.79

PE Ratio

ALG:

17.94

MSFT:

25.45

PEG Ratio

ALG:

2.13

MSFT:

1.78

PS Ratio

ALG:

1.11

MSFT:

10.01

PB Ratio

ALG:

1.55

MSFT:

7.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALG:

$1.63B

MSFT:

$318.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALG:

$399.78M

MSFT:

$217.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALG:

$232.00M

MSFT:

$200.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALG vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALG
ALG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ALG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ALG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALG vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALGMSFTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.82

-0.28

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.04

-0.21

-0.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.21

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-0.44

-0.80

ALG vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALG Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALG and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALGMSFTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.82

-0.28

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.46

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.93

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.75

-0.50

Drawdowns

ALG vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, roughly equal to the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and MSFT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALGMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.23%

-69.38%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.30%

-33.91%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.30%

-33.91%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-37.15%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-37.15%

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.06%

-20.67%

-14.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-21.78%

+2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.76%

15.95%

+4.81%

Volatility

ALG vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) is 9.19%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 9.95%. This indicates that ALG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALGMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.19%

9.95%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.45%

22.34%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.40%

25.12%

+6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.51%

26.63%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.19%

27.04%

+4.15%

Dividends

ALG vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than MSFT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.85%0.71%0.56%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.83%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Financials

ALG vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
417.15M
82.89B
(ALG) Total Revenue
(MSFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALG vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alamo Group Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
67.6%
Portfolio components
ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.81M and revenue of 417.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 42.16M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 29.18M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALG and MSFT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFT has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to ALG (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALG dropped -69.23% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

MSFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALG and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer