PortfoliosLab logo
ALG vs. LNN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALG and LNN is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ALG vs. LNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,125.73%
1,685.25%
ALG
LNN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALG:

-0.25

LNN:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

ALG:

-0.15

LNN:

0.90

Omega Ratio

ALG:

0.98

LNN:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ALG:

-0.23

LNN:

0.35

Martin Ratio

ALG:

-0.66

LNN:

2.03

Ulcer Index

ALG:

10.65%

LNN:

6.72%

Daily Std Dev

ALG:

29.87%

LNN:

34.13%

Max Drawdown

ALG:

-69.22%

LNN:

-82.79%

Current Drawdown

ALG:

-21.21%

LNN:

-24.60%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALG:

$2.10B

LNN:

$1.40B

EPS

ALG:

$9.64

LNN:

$7.04

PE Ratio

ALG:

18.05

LNN:

18.33

PEG Ratio

ALG:

3.89

LNN:

1.17

PS Ratio

ALG:

1.29

LNN:

2.22

PB Ratio

ALG:

2.07

LNN:

2.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALG:

$1.20B

LNN:

$647.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALG:

$296.80M

LNN:

$204.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALG:

$161.94M

LNN:

$110.02M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -3.64% return, which is significantly lower than LNN's 13.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has outperformed LNN with an annualized return of 13.27%, while LNN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.85% annualized return.


ALG

YTD

-3.64%

1M

12.86%

6M

-9.26%

1Y

-7.38%

5Y*

13.22%

10Y*

13.27%

LNN

YTD

13.03%

1M

14.65%

6M

4.57%

1Y

14.00%

5Y*

9.69%

10Y*

6.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALG vs. LNN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALG is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALG is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALG is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALG is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALG is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALG is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

LNN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LNN is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LNN is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LNN is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LNN is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LNN is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LNN is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALG vs. LNN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ALG Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the LNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALG and LNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.25
0.41
ALG
LNN

Dividends

ALG vs. LNN - Dividend Comparison

ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than LNN's 1.07% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.63%0.56%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%0.58%
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.07%1.20%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%1.24%

Drawdowns

ALG vs. LNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, smaller than the maximum LNN drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and LNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-21.21%
-24.60%
ALG
LNN

Volatility

ALG vs. LNN - Volatility Comparison

Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a higher volatility of 11.64% compared to Lindsay Corporation (LNN) at 10.69%. This indicates that ALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.64%
10.69%
ALG
LNN

Financials

ALG vs. LNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Lindsay Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
385.32M
187.06M
(ALG) Total Revenue
(LNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALG vs. LNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alamo Group Inc. and Lindsay Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
23.8%
33.4%
(ALG) Gross Margin
(LNN) Gross Margin
ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 91.79M and revenue of 385.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.8%.

LNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported a gross profit of 62.49M and revenue of 187.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 34.44M and revenue of 385.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.9%.

LNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported an operating income of 32.12M and revenue of 187.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 28.08M and revenue of 385.32M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

LNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lindsay Corporation reported a net income of 26.58M and revenue of 187.06M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.