PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ALG vs. LNN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALG and LNN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

ALG vs. LNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%2,400.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2,239.22%
1,538.34%
ALG
LNN

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALG:

-0.28

LNN:

-0.14

Sortino Ratio

ALG:

-0.22

LNN:

0.03

Omega Ratio

ALG:

0.97

LNN:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

ALG:

-0.29

LNN:

-0.12

Martin Ratio

ALG:

-0.49

LNN:

-0.47

Ulcer Index

ALG:

16.50%

LNN:

10.03%

Daily Std Dev

ALG:

28.85%

LNN:

33.65%

Max Drawdown

ALG:

-69.22%

LNN:

-82.79%

Current Drawdown

ALG:

-17.17%

LNN:

-30.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALG:

$2.37B

LNN:

$1.38B

EPS

ALG:

$9.93

LNN:

$6.01

PE Ratio

ALG:

19.79

LNN:

21.16

PEG Ratio

ALG:

3.89

LNN:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALG:

$1.66B

LNN:

$445.72M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALG:

$417.45M

LNN:

$141.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALG:

$227.99M

LNN:

$70.37M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -9.90% return, which is significantly lower than LNN's -3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has outperformed LNN with an annualized return of 15.01%, while LNN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.92% annualized return.


ALG

YTD

-9.90%

1M

-1.77%

6M

7.98%

1Y

-8.89%

5Y*

9.89%

10Y*

15.01%

LNN

YTD

-3.96%

1M

-4.25%

6M

8.08%

1Y

-5.52%

5Y*

6.18%

10Y*

4.92%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALG vs. LNN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALG, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.28-0.14
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALG, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.220.03
The chart of Omega ratio for ALG, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALG, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.29-0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for ALG, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-0.49-0.47
ALG
LNN

The current ALG Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the LNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALG and LNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.28
-0.14
ALG
LNN

Dividends

ALG vs. LNN - Dividend Comparison

ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than LNN's 1.16% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ALG
Alamo Group Inc.
0.55%0.42%0.51%0.38%0.38%0.38%0.57%0.35%0.47%0.61%0.58%0.46%
LNN
Lindsay Corporation
1.16%1.07%0.82%0.86%0.99%1.29%1.27%1.34%1.53%1.52%1.24%0.59%

Drawdowns

ALG vs. LNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, smaller than the maximum LNN drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and LNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-17.17%
-30.87%
ALG
LNN

Volatility

ALG vs. LNN - Volatility Comparison

Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Lindsay Corporation (LNN) at 6.27%. This indicates that ALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.79%
6.27%
ALG
LNN

Financials

ALG vs. LNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Lindsay Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab