ALG vs. LNN
Compare and contrast key facts about Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALG or LNN.
Key characteristics
| ALG | LNN | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -7.48% | -8.16% |
| 1Y Return | 11.93% | 0.28% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.07% | -9.97% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 13.60% | 7.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.62% | 4.61% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.34 | -0.05 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.53% | 34.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -69.22% | -82.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -14.94% | -33.90% |
Fundamentals
| ALG | LNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $1.31B |
| EPS | $11.23 | $6.25 |
| PE Ratio | 17.27 | 18.93 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.89 | 1.85 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.70B | $644.56M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $376.52M | $213.02M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $244.45M | $113.23M |
Correlation
The correlation between ALG and LNN is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALG vs. LNN - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -7.48% return, which is significantly higher than LNN's -8.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has outperformed LNN with an annualized return of 14.62%, while LNN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.61% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALG vs. LNN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALG vs. LNN - Dividend Comparison
ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than LNN's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 0.49% | 0.42% | 0.51% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.61% | 0.58% | 0.46% |
LNN Lindsay Corporation | 1.18% | 1.07% | 0.82% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 1.34% | 1.53% | 1.52% | 1.24% | 0.59% |
Drawdowns
ALG vs. LNN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, smaller than the maximum LNN drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and LNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALG vs. LNN - Volatility Comparison
Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lindsay Corporation (LNN) have volatilities of 7.21% and 7.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALG vs. LNN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Lindsay Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities