ALG vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALG or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between ALG and LMT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALG vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALG:
-0.28
LMT:
0.59
ALG:
-0.21
LMT:
0.91
ALG:
0.98
LMT:
1.13
ALG:
-0.29
LMT:
0.43
ALG:
-0.47
LMT:
1.22
ALG:
17.28%
LMT:
8.40%
ALG:
29.01%
LMT:
17.45%
ALG:
-69.22%
LMT:
-70.23%
ALG:
-19.67%
LMT:
-19.72%
Fundamentals
ALG:
$2.20B
LMT:
$116.22B
ALG:
$9.94
LMT:
$27.85
ALG:
18.35
LMT:
17.61
ALG:
3.89
LMT:
3.98
ALG:
$1.24B
LMT:
$52.42B
ALG:
$312.59M
LMT:
$6.33B
ALG:
$170.36M
LMT:
$7.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 15.46%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
ALG
-1.75%
-6.10%
-0.34%
-10.59%
7.44%
15.46%
LMT
0.90%
1.53%
4.47%
9.49%
5.67%
12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALG vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALG
LMT
ALG vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALG vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than LMT's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.42% | 0.51% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.61% | 0.58% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.60% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
ALG vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.22%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALG vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.89%. This indicates that ALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALG vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities