ALG vs. BCPC
ALG (Alamo Group Inc.) and BCPC (Balchem Corporation) are both stocks. ALG operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while BCPC operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ALG returned 10.01%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for BCPC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ALG vs. BCPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -8.66% return, which is significantly lower than BCPC's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ALG has underperformed BCPC with an annualized return of 10.01%, while BCPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
ALG
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -10.85%
- YTD
- -8.66%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- -22.49%
- 3Y*
- -4.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
BCPC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- -4.47%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
ALG vs. BCPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG Alamo Group Inc. | -8.66% | -9.12% | -11.07% | 49.19% | -3.27% | 7.09% | 10.41% | 63.18% | -31.19% | 49.01% |
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 2.58% | -5.33% | 10.15% | 22.80% | -27.15% | 46.90% | 13.96% | 30.38% | -2.19% | -3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALG and BCPC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 1993 | 0.27 |
The correlation between ALG and BCPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALG:
$1.85B
BCPC:
$5.08B
ALG:
$8.37
BCPC:
$4.86
ALG:
18.25
BCPC:
32.35
ALG:
2.17
BCPC:
2.51
ALG:
1.13
BCPC:
4.84
ALG:
1.58
BCPC:
3.95
ALG:
$1.63B
BCPC:
$1.06B
ALG:
$399.78M
BCPC:
$383.55M
ALG:
$232.00M
BCPC:
$259.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALG vs. BCPC — Risk / Return Rank
ALG
BCPC
ALG vs. BCPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALG | BCPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | -0.21 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | -0.16 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.98 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.31 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -0.65 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALG | BCPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 | -0.21 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.17 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.40 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
ALG vs. BCPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, smaller than the maximum BCPC drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and BCPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALG | BCPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -85.26% | +16.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.30% | -16.52% | -19.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.30% | -23.10% | -13.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -33.89% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -36.72% | -5.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.92% | -14.16% | -19.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -22.47% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.64% | 7.74% | +12.90% |
Volatility
ALG vs. BCPC - Volatility Comparison
Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Balchem Corporation (BCPC) at 3.83%. This indicates that ALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALG | BCPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 3.83% | +5.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.45% | 16.30% | +11.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.36% | 21.11% | +10.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 24.08% | +5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.19% | 26.81% | +4.38% |
Dividends
ALG vs. BCPC - Dividend Comparison
ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than BCPC's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG Alamo Group Inc. | 0.84% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 0.42% | 0.51% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.57% | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.61% |
BCPC Balchem Corporation | 0.61% | 0.63% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 0.58% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.60% | 0.52% | 0.45% | 0.56% |
Financials
ALG vs. BCPC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamo Group Inc. and Balchem Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALG vs. BCPC - Profitability Comparison
ALG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.81M and revenue of 417.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
BCPC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 101.08M and revenue of 270.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
ALG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 42.16M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
BCPC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 55.63M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.
ALG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 29.18M and revenue of 417.15M, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
BCPC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 40.29M and revenue of 270.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALG and BCPC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALG has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to BCPC (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALG dropped -69.23% vs BCPC's -85.26%.
BCPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALG and BCPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer