ALG vs. BCPC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC).

Performance

ALG vs. BCPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ALG vs. BCPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ALG Alamo Group Inc.	-1.55%	-9.12%	-11.07%	49.19%	-3.27%	7.09%	10.41%	63.18%	-31.19%	49.01%
BCPC Balchem Corporation	10.51%	-5.33%	10.15%	22.80%	-27.15%	46.90%	13.96%	30.38%	-2.19%	-3.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ALG : $1.99B BCPC : $5.48B
EPS ALG : $8.59 BCPC : $4.75
PE Ratio ALG : 19.21 BCPC : 35.67
PEG Ratio ALG : 2.28 BCPC : 2.77
PS Ratio ALG : 1.24 BCPC : 5.33
PB Ratio ALG : 1.73 BCPC : 4.36
Total Revenue (TTM) ALG : $1.60B BCPC : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) ALG : $397.82M BCPC : $370.63M
EBITDA (TTM) ALG : $248.37M BCPC : $254.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALG achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than BCPC's 10.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ALG having a 11.83% annualized return and BCPC not far behind at 11.24%.

ALG

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -22.74%
• YTD: -1.55%
• 6M: -13.29%
• 1Y: -6.82%
• 3Y*: -3.04%
• 5Y*: 1.48%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

BCPC

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -6.59%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 13.64%
• 1Y: 2.72%
• 3Y*: 10.96%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ALG vs. BCPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALG

ALG Risk / Return Rank: 32
ALG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
ALG Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ALG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ALG Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ALG Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BCPC

BCPC Risk / Return Rank: 44
BCPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
BCPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
BCPC Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BCPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BCPC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALG vs. BCPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) and Balchem Corporation (BCPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ALG	BCPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	0.12	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	0.36	-0.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.04	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.26	0.23	-0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.49	0.54	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ALG vs. BCPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALG Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the BCPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALG and BCPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ALG	BCPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	0.12	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.28	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	0.42	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.35	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ALG and BCPC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ALG vs. BCPC - Dividend Comparison

ALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than BCPC's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALG Alamo Group Inc.	0.75%	0.71%	0.56%	0.42%	0.51%	0.38%	0.38%	0.38%	0.57%	0.35%	0.47%	0.61%
BCPC Balchem Corporation	0.57%	0.63%	0.53%	0.80%	0.58%	0.38%	0.50%	0.51%	0.60%	0.52%	0.45%	0.56%

Drawdowns

ALG vs. BCPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALG drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, smaller than the maximum BCPC drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALG and BCPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ALG	BCPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.23%	-85.26%	+16.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.99%	-17.69%	-14.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.07%	-33.89%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	-36.72%	-5.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.78%	-7.52%	-21.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.58%	-22.53%	+2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.81%	7.68%	+9.13%

Volatility

ALG vs. BCPC - Volatility Comparison

Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) has a higher volatility of 19.03% compared to Balchem Corporation (BCPC) at 6.10%. This indicates that ALG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ALG	BCPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.03%	6.10%	+12.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.65%	15.62%	+10.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.17%	22.33%	+10.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.15%	24.08%	+5.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.14%	26.89%	+4.25%

Financials

ALG vs. BCPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Alamo Group Inc. and Balchem Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ALG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 85.00M and revenue of 373.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

BCPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a gross profit of 93.90M and revenue of 263.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.6%.

ALG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported an operating income of 22.53M and revenue of 373.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

BCPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported an operating income of 52.29M and revenue of 263.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

ALG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamo Group Inc. reported a net income of 15.51M and revenue of 373.65M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

BCPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Balchem Corporation reported a net income of 39.23M and revenue of 263.62M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.