ALBA.L vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALBA.L or SQM.
Correlation
The correlation between ALBA.L and SQM is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ALBA.L:
-0.94
SQM:
-0.27
ALBA.L:
-1.61
SQM:
-0.11
ALBA.L:
0.67
SQM:
0.99
ALBA.L:
-0.75
SQM:
-0.18
ALBA.L:
-1.40
SQM:
-0.60
ALBA.L:
53.76%
SQM:
19.97%
ALBA.L:
79.85%
SQM:
43.44%
ALBA.L:
-99.82%
SQM:
-77.79%
ALBA.L:
-99.80%
SQM:
-60.09%
Fundamentals
ALBA.L:
£2.57M
SQM:
$11.03B
ALBA.L:
£0.00
SQM:
-$1.12
ALBA.L:
0.00
SQM:
1.65
ALBA.L:
-£6.00K
SQM:
$1.03B
ALBA.L:
-£483.00K
SQM:
$1.07B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALBA.L achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ALBA.L has underperformed SQM with an annualized return of -21.79%, while SQM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.69% annualized return.
ALBA.L
-0.00%
-0.00%
-37.33%
-75.26%
-27.85%
-21.79%
SQM
8.75%
7.74%
12.30%
-2.27%
10.09%
9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ALBA.L vs. SQM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ALBA.L
SQM
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
ALBA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALBA.L Alba Mineral Resources | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 0.54% | 0.59% | 8.51% | 9.79% | 3.90% | 1.65% | 4.59% | 5.41% | 2.39% | 5.31% | 2.41% | 5.83% |
Drawdowns
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALBA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than SQM's maximum drawdown of -77.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBA.L and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) has a higher volatility of 14.17% compared to Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) at 9.61%. This indicates that ALBA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ALBA.L vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alba Mineral Resources and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities