ALBA.L vs. ALTM

In the year-to-date period, ALBA.L achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly lower than ALTM's 11.89% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ALBA.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.94, which is lower than the ALTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALBA.L and ALTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ALBA.L nor ALTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ALBA.L drawdown since its inception was -99.82%, which is greater than ALTM's maximum drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALBA.L and ALTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA.L) has a higher volatility of 14.17% compared to Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) at 8.21%. This indicates that ALBA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alba Mineral Resources and Arcadium Lithium plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.