PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ALB vs. CE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ALB and CE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

ALB vs. CE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Celanese Corporation (CE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%1,100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
659.65%
502.82%
ALB
CE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ALB:

-0.31

CE:

-1.21

Sortino Ratio

ALB:

-0.08

CE:

-1.64

Omega Ratio

ALB:

0.99

CE:

0.74

Calmar Ratio

ALB:

-0.23

CE:

-0.78

Martin Ratio

ALB:

-0.66

CE:

-1.62

Ulcer Index

ALB:

27.23%

CE:

29.66%

Daily Std Dev

ALB:

57.65%

CE:

39.70%

Max Drawdown

ALB:

-77.22%

CE:

-84.87%

Current Drawdown

ALB:

-69.26%

CE:

-57.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALB:

$11.46B

CE:

$7.94B

EPS

ALB:

-$17.32

CE:

$10.14

PEG Ratio

ALB:

8.71

CE:

4.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALB:

$4.15B

CE:

$7.91B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALB:

-$78.57M

CE:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ALB:

-$1.29B

CE:

$1.65B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALB achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than CE's 4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, ALB has outperformed CE with an annualized return of 6.72%, while CE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.43% annualized return.


ALB

YTD

13.26%

1M

9.64%

6M

6.77%

1Y

-14.01%

5Y*

4.97%

10Y*

6.72%

CE

YTD

4.91%

1M

8.32%

6M

-47.15%

1Y

-48.97%

5Y*

-7.18%

10Y*

4.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALB vs. CE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CE is 33
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CE is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CE is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CE is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CE is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CE is 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALB vs. CE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Celanese Corporation (CE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.31-1.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.08-1.64
The chart of Omega ratio for ALB, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.990.74
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.23-0.78
The chart of Martin ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.66-1.62
ALB
CE

The current ALB Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is higher than the CE Sharpe Ratio of -1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALB and CE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.31
-1.21
ALB
CE

Dividends

ALB vs. CE - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than CE's 3.86% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
1.65%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.02%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%
CE
Celanese Corporation
3.86%4.05%1.80%2.68%1.62%1.91%1.95%2.31%1.62%1.75%1.71%1.55%

Drawdowns

ALB vs. CE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALB drawdown since its inception was -77.22%, smaller than the maximum CE drawdown of -84.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALB and CE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-69.26%
-57.11%
ALB
CE

Volatility

ALB vs. CE - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Celanese Corporation (CE) at 8.66%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
12.56%
8.66%
ALB
CE

Financials

ALB vs. CE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Celanese Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab