PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
ALB vs. ALTM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

ALB vs. ALTM

Last updated Apr 25, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ALB or ALTM.

Correlation

The correlation between ALB and ALTM is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

ALB vs. ALTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.
-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-57.62%
-14.89%
ALB
ALTM

Key characteristics

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALB:

$6.55B

ALTM:

$6.29B

EPS

ALB:

-$11.38

ALTM:

$0.09

PEG Ratio

ALB:

0.99

ALTM:

1.09

PS Ratio

ALB:

1.22

ALTM:

6.24

PB Ratio

ALB:

0.83

ALTM:

1.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALB:

$4.02B

ALTM:

$746.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALB:

$23.60M

ALTM:

$124.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALB:

-$1.00B

ALTM:

$46.70M

Returns By Period

ALB

YTD

-32.04%

1M

-25.11%

6M

-38.28%

1Y

-48.63%

5Y*

-0.01%

10Y*

1.35%

ALTM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ALB vs. ALTM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ALB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALB is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALB is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALB is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALB is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALB is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALB is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
ALTM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALTM is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALTM is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALTM is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ALB vs. ALTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Albemarle Corporation (ALB) and Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The chart of Sharpe ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
ALB: -0.81
ALTM: 0.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for ALB, currently valued at -1.13, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
ALB: -1.13
ALTM: 2.10
The chart of Omega ratio for ALB, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
ALB: 0.87
ALTM: 1.29
The chart of Calmar ratio for ALB, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
ALB: -0.74
ALTM: 0.76
The chart of Martin ratio for ALB, currently valued at -1.42, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
ALB: -1.42
ALTM: 2.27

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16Feb 23Mar 02Mar 09Mar 16Mar 23Mar 30Apr 06Apr 13Apr 20
-0.81
0.78
ALB
ALTM

Dividends

ALB vs. ALTM - Dividend Comparison

ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while ALTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ALB
Albemarle Corporation		2.78%1.87%1.11%0.73%0.67%1.04%2.01%1.74%1.00%1.42%2.07%1.83%
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium plc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ALB vs. ALTM - Drawdown Comparison

-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-58.40%
-17.86%
ALB
ALTM

Volatility

ALB vs. ALTM - Volatility Comparison

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) has a higher volatility of 30.65% compared to Arcadium Lithium plc (ALTM) at 0.00%. This indicates that ALB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
30.65%
0
ALB
ALTM

Financials

ALB vs. ALTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Albemarle Corporation and Arcadium Lithium plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Values in USD except per share items