ALAB vs. WMT
ALAB (Astera Labs, Inc.) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. ALAB operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past year, ALAB returned 134.93% vs 14.07% for WMT. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
ALAB vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 91.41% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 1.23% return.
ALAB
- 1D
- -11.96%
- 1M
- -26.42%
- 6M
- 120.11%
- YTD
- 91.41%
- 1Y
- 134.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 113.41%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -11.89%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 1Y
- 14.07%
- 3Y*
- 30.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.74B | $1.61B | $1.98B | |
WMT Walmart Inc. | $2.58B | $2.37B | $2.77B |
ALAB vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. | 91.41% | 25.60% | 152.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 1.23% | 24.49% | 49.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALAB and WMT is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024 | -0.06 |
The correlation between ALAB and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ALAB:
$54.58B
WMT:
$894.01B
ALAB:
$2.04
WMT:
$2.88
ALAB:
156.25
WMT:
39.01
ALAB:
48.03
WMT:
1.24
ALAB:
33.63
WMT:
9.53
ALAB:
$1.20B
WMT:
$725.31B
ALAB:
$903.00M
WMT:
$181.16B
ALAB:
$326.36M
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALAB vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
ALAB
WMT
ALAB vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALAB | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.12 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 0.73 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 1.85 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALAB vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALAB | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.69% | -77.14% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.19% | -19.23% | -40.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.08% | -16.29% | -17.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.01% | -14.63% | -14.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.97% | 7.62% | +24.35% |
Volatility
ALAB vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) has a higher volatility of 36.03% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 6.18%. This indicates that ALAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALAB | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.03% | 6.18% | +29.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.35% | 18.91% | +60.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 101.95% | 24.77% | +77.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.76% | 21.95% | +73.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.76% | 21.90% | +73.86% |
Dividends
ALAB vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
ALAB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.86% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
ALAB vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ALAB vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison
ALAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 287.57M and revenue of 392.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.3%.
WMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.
ALAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 89.25M and revenue of 392.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.
WMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
ALAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 153.09M and revenue of 392.40M, resulting in a net margin of 39.0%.
WMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ALAB and WMT have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALAB has higher volatility (36.03%) compared to WMT (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs WMT's -77.14%.
ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALAB and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer