PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALAB vs. LUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ALAB vs. LUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALAB achieves a 118.53% return, which is significantly higher than LUNR's 108.44% return.


ALAB

1D
2.19%
1M
80.64%
YTD
118.53%
6M
138.39%
1Y
282.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LUNR

1D
-14.51%
1M
33.45%
YTD
108.44%
6M
231.67%
1Y
206.71%
3Y*
66.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALAB vs. LUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ALAB
Astera Labs, Inc.
118.53%25.60%113.53%
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
108.44%-10.63%224.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ALAB and LUNR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ALAB:

$65.86B

LUNR:

$5.00T

EPS

ALAB:

$1.48

LUNR:

-$0.00

PS Ratio

ALAB:

65.44

LUNR:

3.75K

Total Revenue (TTM)

ALAB:

$1.00B

LUNR:

$334.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ALAB:

$760.99M

LUNR:

$85.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

ALAB:

$253.12M

LUNR:

-$96.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALAB vs. LUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALAB
ALAB Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ALAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAB Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAB Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALAB vs. LUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) and Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALABLUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

4.97

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

10.59

-1.28

ALAB vs. LUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALAB Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the LUNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALAB and LUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALABLUNRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

1.92

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.19

+1.16

Drawdowns

ALAB vs. LUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALAB drawdown since its inception was -63.69%, smaller than the maximum LUNR drawdown of -97.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALAB and LUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALABLUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.69%

-97.43%

+33.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.19%

-41.88%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-58.74%

+58.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-63.26%

+33.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.49%

19.61%

+10.88%

Volatility

ALAB vs. LUNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astera Labs, Inc. (ALAB) is 29.16%, while Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a volatility of 43.33%. This indicates that ALAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALABLUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.16%

43.33%

-14.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.78%

90.47%

-19.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.41%

108.47%

-14.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.55%

171.46%

-78.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.55%

171.46%

-78.91%

Dividends

ALAB vs. LUNR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ALAB nor LUNR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ALAB vs. LUNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astera Labs, Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
308.36M
186.73M
(ALAB) Total Revenue
(LUNR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ALAB vs. LUNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astera Labs, Inc. and Intuitive Machines Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
76.3%
39.0%
Portfolio components
ALAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 235.14M and revenue of 308.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

ALAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 61.83M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

ALAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astera Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 80.31M and revenue of 308.36M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ALAB and LUNR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (43.33%) compared to ALAB (29.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALAB dropped -63.69% vs LUNR's -97.43%.

ALAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALAB and LUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer