PortfoliosLab logo
AL vs. PM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AL and PM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AL vs. PM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Air Lease Corporation (AL) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AL:

0.41

PM:

2.96

Sortino Ratio

AL:

0.78

PM:

4.15

Omega Ratio

AL:

1.11

PM:

1.62

Calmar Ratio

AL:

0.71

PM:

6.86

Martin Ratio

AL:

1.62

PM:

20.96

Ulcer Index

AL:

9.53%

PM:

3.59%

Daily Std Dev

AL:

37.05%

PM:

24.86%

Max Drawdown

AL:

-78.22%

PM:

-42.87%

Current Drawdown

AL:

0.00%

PM:

-6.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AL:

$6.20B

PM:

$256.56B

EPS

AL:

$5.72

PM:

$6.35

PE Ratio

AL:

9.70

PM:

25.96

PEG Ratio

AL:

0.91

PM:

1.25

PS Ratio

AL:

2.21

PM:

6.68

PB Ratio

AL:

0.76

PM:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

AL:

$2.75B

PM:

$38.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AL:

$1.68B

PM:

$24.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

AL:

$1.44B

PM:

$16.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AL achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 38.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AL has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 4.86%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


AL

YTD

15.60%

1M

34.77%

6M

15.75%

1Y

15.07%

5Y*

22.67%

10Y*

4.86%

PM

YTD

38.17%

1M

7.11%

6M

34.56%

1Y

72.82%

5Y*

25.61%

10Y*

12.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AL vs. PM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AL is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AL is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AL is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AL is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AL is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PM is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PM is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PM is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PM is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PM is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PM is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AL vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Air Lease Corporation (AL) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AL Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the PM Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AL and PM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

AL vs. PM - Dividend Comparison

AL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than PM's 3.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AL
Air Lease Corporation
1.55%1.76%1.93%1.97%1.50%1.37%1.14%1.42%0.68%0.66%0.51%0.38%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.25%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%4.76%

Drawdowns

AL vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AL drawdown since its inception was -78.22%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AL and PM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AL vs. PM - Volatility Comparison

Air Lease Corporation (AL) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) at 6.34%. This indicates that AL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AL vs. PM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Air Lease Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
738.28M
9.30B
(AL) Total Revenue
(PM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AL vs. PM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Air Lease Corporation and Philip Morris International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
67.3%
(AL) Gross Margin
(PM) Gross Margin
AL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Air Lease Corporation reported a gross profit of 738.28M and revenue of 738.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.26B and revenue of 9.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

AL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Air Lease Corporation reported an operating income of 678.93M and revenue of 738.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.0%.

PM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.54B and revenue of 9.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.1%.

AL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Air Lease Corporation reported a net income of 364.75M and revenue of 738.28M, resulting in a net margin of 49.4%.

PM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.69B and revenue of 9.30B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.