AKRBY vs. TM2.F
Compare and contrast key facts about Aker BP ASA (AKRBY) and Sydbank A/S (TM2.F).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AKRBY or TM2.F.
Key characteristics
AKRBY | TM2.F | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -14.19% | 190.01% |
1Y Return | -14.19% | 181.57% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.25 | 1.49 |
Sortino Ratio | 0.02 | 8.85 |
Omega Ratio | 1.00 | 2.06 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.51 | 9.91 |
Martin Ratio | -1.09 | 26.56 |
Ulcer Index | 12.98% | 6.75% |
Daily Std Dev | 56.72% | 119.05% |
Max Drawdown | -27.86% | -76.16% |
Current Drawdown | -27.36% | -7.45% |
Fundamentals
AKRBY | TM2.F | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $14.32B | €2.41B |
EPS | $1.14 | €8.11 |
PE Ratio | 9.96 | 5.73 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $9.42B | €7.64B |
Correlation
The correlation between AKRBY and TM2.F is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AKRBY achieves a -14.19% return, which is significantly lower than TM2.F's 190.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aker BP ASA (AKRBY) and Sydbank A/S (TM2.F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Dividend Comparison
AKRBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.09%, more than TM2.F's 8.77% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aker BP ASA | 12.09% | 8.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Sydbank A/S | 8.77% | 5.81% | 4.09% | 4.74% | 7.14% | 6.84% | 7.52% | 4.25% | 1.48% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AKRBY drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum TM2.F drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKRBY and TM2.F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Volatility Comparison
Aker BP ASA (AKRBY) has a higher volatility of 29.56% compared to Sydbank A/S (TM2.F) at 9.11%. This indicates that AKRBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM2.F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AKRBY vs. TM2.F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aker BP ASA and Sydbank A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities