PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AKR vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AKR vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AKR vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
-5.28%-11.52%47.65%24.36%-31.18%58.37%-44.09%13.78%-9.40%-13.13%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-4.03%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-13.86%1.07%15.13%-2.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AKR achieves a -5.28% return, which is significantly lower than BTAL's -4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AKR has outperformed BTAL with an annualized return of -2.27%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively lower -3.26% annualized return.


AKR

1D
0.68%
1M
-7.31%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-3.56%
1Y
-3.25%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
-2.27%

BTAL

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
-4.03%
6M
-9.59%
1Y
-31.80%
3Y*
-8.62%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*
-3.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AKR vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AKR
AKR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
AKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AKR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AKR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AKR vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AKRBTALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.12

-1.42

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.01

-2.16

+2.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.77

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.92

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.60

-1.25

+0.65

AKR vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AKR Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AKR and BTAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AKRBTALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

-1.42

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

-0.09

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

-0.19

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.17

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between AKR and BTAL is -0.27. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AKR vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

AKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than BTAL's 2.59% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
4.16%3.89%3.06%4.24%5.02%2.75%2.04%4.36%4.59%3.84%3.55%2.93%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
2.59%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AKR vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AKR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AKR and BTAL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AKRBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.02%

-41.01%

-30.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.42%

-34.94%

+17.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.82%

-34.94%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.02%

-41.01%

-30.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.75%

-40.18%

+14.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.41%

-21.67%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.16%

25.73%

-18.57%

Volatility

AKR vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) at 6.72%. This indicates that AKR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AKRBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

6.72%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.51%

15.84%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.60%

22.50%

+4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.28%

18.36%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.26%

17.04%

+17.22%