PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIZN vs. AFGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIZN vs. AFGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat (AIZN) and American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIZN achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than AFGB's -0.72% return.


AIZN

1D
-0.26%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
0.47%
6M
1.13%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*

AFGB

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
-0.72%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
6.21%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIZN vs. AFGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AIZN
Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat
0.47%3.51%6.98%5.61%-20.52%4.41%1.57%
AFGB
American Financial Group, Inc.
-0.72%2.35%-0.22%13.72%-11.75%-1.01%4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between AIZN and AFGB is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2020

0.41

The correlation between AIZN and AFGB shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AIZN:

$964.80M

AFGB:

$1.75B

EPS

AIZN:

$19.68

AFGB:

$10.54

PE Ratio

AIZN:

0.98

AFGB:

2.00

PS Ratio

AIZN:

0.07

AFGB:

0.22

PB Ratio

AIZN:

0.16

AFGB:

0.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

AIZN:

$13.16B

AFGB:

$8.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AIZN:

$10.24B

AFGB:

$5.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

AIZN:

$1.52B

AFGB:

$689.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat

American Financial Group, Inc.

Often compared with AIZN:
AIZN vs. CB
Often compared with AFGB:
AFGB vs. TLT

Return for Risk

AIZN vs. AFGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIZN
AIZN Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
AIZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AIZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AFGB
AFGB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AFGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFGB Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AFGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFGB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIZN vs. AFGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat (AIZN) and American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIZNAFGBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.15

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.73

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.78

1.50

-0.72

AIZN vs. AFGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the AFGB Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIZN and AFGB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIZNAFGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.82

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.00

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.16

-0.17

Drawdowns

AIZN vs. AFGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIZN drawdown since its inception was -28.89%, smaller than the maximum AFGB drawdown of -36.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIZN and AFGB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIZNAFGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.89%

-36.35%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-8.56%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.29%

-14.84%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.89%

-22.01%

-6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.36%

-7.99%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-6.03%

-4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

4.15%

+0.53%

Volatility

AIZN vs. AFGB - Volatility Comparison

Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat (AIZN) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to American Financial Group, Inc. (AFGB) at 1.55%. This indicates that AIZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIZNAFGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

1.55%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

5.23%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

7.61%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

14.29%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

18.48%

-0.55%

Dividends

AIZN vs. AFGB - Dividend Comparison

AIZN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, less than AFGB's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AFGB
American Financial Group, Inc.
6.98%6.82%6.52%6.13%6.54%5.44%5.10%1.34%
AIZN
Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat
6.83%6.75%6.54%6.58%6.50%5.62%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AIZN vs. AFGB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat and American Financial Group, Inc. . You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
3.42B
1.85B
(AIZN) Total Revenue
(AFGB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AIZN vs. AFGB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat and American Financial Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
77.5%
0
Portfolio components
AIZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat reported a gross profit of 2.65B and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

AFGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AIZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat reported an operating income of 335.60M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

AFGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AIZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Assurant, Inc. 5.25% Subordinat reported a net income of 274.10M and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.

AFGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 191.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AIZN and AFGB have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIZN has higher volatility (1.78%) compared to AFGB (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIZN dropped -28.89% vs AFGB's -36.35%.

AFGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIZN and AFGB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer