PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIT vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIT vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIT achieves a 34.91% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AIT has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 23.90%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.


AIT

1D
1.58%
1M
4.34%
6M
33.02%
YTD
34.91%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
33.99%
5Y*
32.17%
10Y*
23.90%
ALL TIME*
14.31%

QYLD

1D
0.65%
1M
-0.98%
6M
5.88%
YTD
7.67%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
8.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$84.02M$95.56M$87.20M
$83.30M$78.68M$98.28M

AIT vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
34.91%8.01%39.67%38.35%24.25%33.57%19.37%26.35%-19.41%16.89%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.67%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%18.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AIT and QYLD is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.40

The correlation between AIT and QYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIT vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AIT
AIT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AIT vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AITQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.38

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

15.70

-10.53

AIT vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIT and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AIT vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIT drawdown since its inception was -66.47%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIT and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AITQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.47%

-24.75%

-41.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-5.78%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.42%

-19.06%

-7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.42%

-24.61%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

-24.75%

-34.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-2.96%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-3.81%

-14.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.44%

1.24%

+4.20%

Volatility

AIT vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.19%. This indicates that AIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AITQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

5.19%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

10.04%

+9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.62%

11.26%

+15.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.43%

15.04%

+15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.35%

15.63%

+17.72%

Dividends

AIT vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

AIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QYLD's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIT
Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.
0.56%0.72%0.62%0.81%1.08%1.29%1.64%1.86%2.22%1.70%1.89%2.67%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.89%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIT and QYLD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIT has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to QYLD (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIT dropped -66.47% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIT and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer