PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQ vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AIQ having a 35.98% return and XLK slightly higher at 36.47%.


AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQ vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-14.03%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and XLK is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.90

The correlation between AIQ and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQ
XLK

Technology

73.3%
99.7%

Communication Services

13.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

-

Industrials

4.2%
0.1%

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AIQ
73.3%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

AIQ
13.2%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

AIQ
8.5%
XLK

-

Industrials

AIQ
4.2%
XLK
0.1%

Healthcare

AIQ
0.4%
XLK

-

Financial Services

AIQ
0.4%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

AIQ

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

AIQ

-

XLK

-

Energy

AIQ

-

XLK
0.2%

Real Estate

AIQ

-

XLK

-

Utilities

AIQ

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIQXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.52

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.22

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

14.16

+0.43

AIQ vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIQXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

3.24

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.96

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.42

+0.42

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-82.05%

+37.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-15.92%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-25.66%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

-33.56%

-11.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.00%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-34.96%

+25.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

4.74%

+0.02%

Volatility

AIQ vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that AIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

6.98%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

16.68%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

20.82%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

24.90%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

24.49%

+1.01%

AIQ vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQ vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AIQ and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 23.83% vs 19.07% for AIQ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.83% return vs 19.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQ and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer