PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIQ vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AIQ vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIQ achieves a 35.98% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.


AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*

IQM

1D
-0.37%
1M
11.94%
YTD
40.18%
6M
38.57%
1Y
75.07%
3Y*
37.62%
5Y*
22.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIQ vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%56.98%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
40.18%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AIQ and IQM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

0.89

The correlation between AIQ and IQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

AIQ vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AIQ
IQM

Technology

73.3%
65.9%

Communication Services

13.2%
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
4.1%

Industrials

4.2%
19.9%

Healthcare

0.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.3%

Technology

AIQ
73.3%
IQM
65.9%

Communication Services

AIQ
13.2%
IQM
2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AIQ
8.5%
IQM
4.1%

Industrials

AIQ
4.2%
IQM
19.9%

Healthcare

AIQ
0.4%
IQM
1.1%

Financial Services

AIQ
0.4%
IQM

-

Basic Materials

AIQ

-

IQM

-

Consumer Defensive

AIQ

-

IQM

-

Energy

AIQ

-

IQM
2.7%

Real Estate

AIQ

-

IQM

-

Utilities

AIQ

-

IQM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIQ vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIQ vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIQIQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

5.13

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

16.79

-2.20

AIQ vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIQ Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIQ and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIQIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.67

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.96

-0.12

Drawdowns

AIQ vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIQ drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, roughly equal to the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIQ and IQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIQIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-44.91%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.47%

-14.71%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-30.42%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.66%

-44.91%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.37%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-12.25%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

4.49%

+0.27%

Volatility

AIQ vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) is 8.60%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that AIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIQIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.60%

9.20%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.46%

22.92%

-4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

28.27%

-5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

28.91%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.50%

30.72%

-5.22%

AIQ vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AIQ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

AIQ vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

AIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AIQ and IQM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to AIQ (8.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AIQ dropped -44.66% vs IQM's -44.91%.

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 19.07% for AIQ. On fees, IQM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 19.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

AIQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while IQM is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AIQ and 0.50% for IQM.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIQ and IQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer