PortfoliosLab logo
AIO vs. PLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AIO and PLTR is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

AIO vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
74.46%
1,208.21%
AIO
PLTR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AIO:

0.79

PLTR:

6.44

Sortino Ratio

AIO:

1.15

PLTR:

4.96

Omega Ratio

AIO:

1.17

PLTR:

1.69

Calmar Ratio

AIO:

0.68

PLTR:

9.87

Martin Ratio

AIO:

2.48

PLTR:

33.00

Ulcer Index

AIO:

8.24%

PLTR:

14.11%

Daily Std Dev

AIO:

26.08%

PLTR:

72.47%

Max Drawdown

AIO:

-44.88%

PLTR:

-84.62%

Current Drawdown

AIO:

-14.16%

PLTR:

-0.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIO achieves a -10.42% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's 64.33% return.


AIO

YTD

-10.42%

1M

4.02%

6M

0.85%

1Y

18.92%

5Y*

17.57%

10Y*

N/A

PLTR

YTD

64.33%

1M

42.12%

6M

196.47%

1Y

451.13%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AIO vs. PLTR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AIO is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AIO is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AIO is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AIO is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AIO is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AIO is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PLTR is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PLTR is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PLTR is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AIO vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for AIO, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
AIO: 0.79
PLTR: 6.44
The chart of Sortino ratio for AIO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
AIO: 1.15
PLTR: 4.96
The chart of Omega ratio for AIO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
AIO: 1.17
PLTR: 1.69
The chart of Calmar ratio for AIO, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
AIO: 0.68
PLTR: 9.87
The chart of Martin ratio for AIO, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.00
AIO: 2.48
PLTR: 33.00

The current AIO Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIO and PLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.002.004.006.008.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.79
6.44
AIO
PLTR

Dividends

AIO vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

AIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019
AIO
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund
8.37%7.30%10.34%11.12%19.97%9.30%0.54%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AIO vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIO drawdown since its inception was -44.88%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIO and PLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.16%
-0.27%
AIO
PLTR

Volatility

AIO vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund (AIO) is 16.54%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 27.88%. This indicates that AIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.54%
27.88%
AIO
PLTR

User Portfolios with AIO or PLTR


(no name)
64%
YTD
PLTR
Many
57%
YTD
PM
GC=F
VH2.DE
AM.PA
AG1.DE
TGTX
OLA.TO
DB1.DE
LTH
PLTR
GEV
AVGO
RHM.DE
1 / 118

Recent discussions

How is Sharpe ratio calculated?

The highest sharpe ratio portfolioi in User portfolios holds only ultrashort treasuries and show a sharpe ratio of 7+. But my understanding is the Sharpe ratio is the return less the risk-free rate divided by the standard deviation of returns. But short-term treasuries ARE the risk free rate, so the Sharpe ratio should be zero since the risk free rate minus the risk free rate is zero. So are you simply ignoring the risk-free rate and dividing returns by the standard deviation???

Addendum:

Just input my portfolio and asked that your site optimize it for Sharpe ratio. I have ready cash in USFR, and ETF that holds US floating rate notes exclusively. The optimization recommended I put over 99% in USFR. However, the interest rate on floating rate notes is based on the three month treasury, so again, USFR has a Sharpe ratio of zero! Please correct this!

Bob Peticolas

December 12, 23 Posted in general
988

Screener

Can someone guide me on how to use the ETF and stock screener ? I have tried several times with no luck .....

michael

October 14, 24 Posted in general
216

Going forward performance roughly coinciding with historically optimized portfolios on this site?

I'm quite new to the site, but I am concerned that a portfolio optimized with past data may have no bearing at all on its future performance. Has anyone been around long enough to speak to this concern. Have you outperformed a relevant benchmark with actual invested money?

Also, if you've been here awhile, what tools on the site do you find most useful?

Thanks for reading!

Bob Peticolas

December 19, 23 Posted in general
1K