PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AIL.DE vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AIL.DE vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Air Liquide SA (AIL.DE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AIL.DE is traded in EUR, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AIL.DE achieves a 15.64% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 14.36% return. Over the past 10 years, AIL.DE has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.46%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.16% annualized return.


AIL.DE

1D
1.02%
1M
3.34%
YTD
15.64%
6M
13.67%
1Y
0.82%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
13.46%

COST

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
14.36%
6M
9.14%
1Y
-8.58%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
22.64%
10Y*
22.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AIL.DE vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AIL.DE
Air Liquide SA
15.64%5.45%-1.53%34.16%-2.67%16.10%9.17%33.69%3.31%13.80%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.36%-16.62%48.84%44.54%-14.03%63.18%21.73%48.99%15.79%7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AIL.DE and COST is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AIL.DE vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AIL.DE
AIL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AIL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AIL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AIL.DE vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Air Liquide SA (AIL.DE) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AIL.DECOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.95

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

-0.46

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

-0.98

+1.08

AIL.DE vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AIL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AIL.DE and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AIL.DECOSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

-0.42

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.98

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.98

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Drawdowns

AIL.DE vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AIL.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIL.DE and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AIL.DECOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.86%

-38.85%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.87%

-18.64%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.33%

-29.57%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

-29.57%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.48%

-29.57%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-18.19%

+16.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-8.13%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.99%

11.31%

-3.32%

Volatility

AIL.DE vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Air Liquide SA (AIL.DE) is 6.63%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 8.72%. This indicates that AIL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AIL.DECOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

8.72%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

15.83%

-1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

20.42%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

23.10%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

22.68%

-2.24%

Dividends

AIL.DE vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

AIL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIL.DE
Air Liquide SA
2.04%2.06%1.88%1.67%1.97%1.79%2.00%1.90%2.49%2.24%2.49%2.49%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%

Financials

AIL.DE vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Air Liquide SA and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AIL.DE values in EUR, COST values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


AIL.DE and COST have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AIL.DE and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer