AIA vs. VUG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG).
AIA and VUG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. VUG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both AIA and VUG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AIA or VUG.
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and VUG is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AIA vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AIA:
1.14
VUG:
2.11
AIA:
1.68
VUG:
2.74
AIA:
1.21
VUG:
1.39
AIA:
0.58
VUG:
2.81
AIA:
4.72
VUG:
11.02
AIA:
5.53%
VUG:
3.31%
AIA:
22.88%
VUG:
17.27%
AIA:
-60.89%
VUG:
-50.68%
AIA:
-26.61%
VUG:
-2.41%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 34.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AIA has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 6.22%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.88% annualized return.
AIA
21.16%
0.22%
3.83%
23.51%
2.98%
6.22%
VUG
34.89%
3.42%
12.16%
35.02%
18.91%
15.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIA vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AIA vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AIA vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than VUG's 0.33% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.59% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.50% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 2.24% | 2.07% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% | 1.21% | 1.19% |
Drawdowns
AIA vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and VUG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AIA vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 5.09% and 4.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.