AIA vs. BBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX).
AIA and BBAX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. BBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2018. Both AIA and BBAX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AIA or BBAX.
Correlation
The correlation between AIA and BBAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AIA vs. BBAX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AIA:
1.14
BBAX:
0.34
AIA:
1.68
BBAX:
0.58
AIA:
1.21
BBAX:
1.07
AIA:
0.58
BBAX:
0.41
AIA:
4.72
BBAX:
1.39
AIA:
5.53%
BBAX:
3.82%
AIA:
22.88%
BBAX:
15.56%
AIA:
-60.89%
BBAX:
-39.64%
AIA:
-26.61%
BBAX:
-10.12%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AIA achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly higher than BBAX's 1.92% return.
AIA
21.16%
0.22%
3.83%
23.51%
2.98%
6.22%
BBAX
1.92%
-5.33%
2.37%
3.28%
3.26%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AIA vs. BBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AIA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAX's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AIA vs. BBAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AIA vs. BBAX - Dividend Comparison
AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than BBAX's 3.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.59% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.50% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 2.24% | 2.07% |
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF | 3.32% | 4.17% | 5.06% | 5.47% | 2.57% | 4.07% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AIA vs. BBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AIA drawdown since its inception was -60.89%, which is greater than BBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AIA and BBAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AIA vs. BBAX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) at 4.72%. This indicates that AIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.