AI vs. DT
AI (C3.ai, Inc.) and DT (Dynatrace, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — AI in Information Technology Services, DT in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, AI returned -30.92%/yr vs -7.21%/yr for DT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AI vs. DT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AI achieves a -28.04% return, which is significantly lower than DT's -6.65% return.
AI
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 6M
- -33.65%
- 1Y
- -58.90%
- 3Y*
- -33.77%
- 5Y*
- -30.92%
- 10Y*
- —
DT
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- -6.65%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- -25.64%
- 3Y*
- -7.17%
- 5Y*
- -7.21%
- 10Y*
- —
AI vs. DT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AI C3.ai, Inc. | -28.04% | -60.85% | 19.92% | 156.57% | -64.19% | -77.48% | 38.75% |
DT Dynatrace, Inc. | -6.65% | -20.26% | -0.62% | 42.79% | -36.54% | 39.47% | 6.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between AI and DT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AI and DT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
AI:
$1.42B
DT:
$12.09B
AI:
-$3.37
DT:
$0.73
AI:
5.42
DT:
6.07
AI:
2.17
DT:
4.63
AI:
$250.27M
DT:
$2.02B
AI:
$77.38M
DT:
$1.65B
AI:
-$461.00M
DT:
$289.14M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AI vs. DT — Risk / Return Rank
AI
DT
AI vs. DT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AI | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | -0.60 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | -1.04 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AI vs. DT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AI drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, which is greater than DT's maximum drawdown of -61.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AI and DT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AI | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.63% | -61.77% | -33.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.39% | -42.87% | -30.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.51% | -48.16% | -34.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.32% | -61.77% | -26.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.53% | -48.63% | -45.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.97% | -30.79% | -51.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.73% | 24.71% | +28.02% |
Volatility
AI vs. DT - Volatility Comparison
C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) at 12.40%. This indicates that AI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AI | DT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.04% | 12.40% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.17% | 33.39% | +14.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.65% | 39.41% | +26.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.68% | 40.77% | +36.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.99% | 46.50% | +35.49% |
Dividends
AI vs. DT - Dividend Comparison
Neither AI nor DT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AI vs. DT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between C3.ai, Inc. and Dynatrace, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AI and DT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AI has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to DT (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AI dropped -95.63% vs DT's -61.77%.
DT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AI and DT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer