PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AHTPX vs. QIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AHTPX vs. QIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AHTPX vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
3.28%7.76%6.73%8.08%
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
-18.32%-38.02%0.19%1.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHTPX achieves a 3.28% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -18.32% return.


AHTPX

1D
0.36%
1M
-6.92%
YTD
3.28%
6M
8.45%
1Y
10.56%
3Y*
8.83%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*

QIS

1D
-4.55%
1M
-14.21%
YTD
-18.32%
6M
-36.75%
1Y
-47.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AHTPX vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AHTPX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AHTPX vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AHTPX
AHTPX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AHTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AHTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QIS
QIS Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AHTPX vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AHTPXQISDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

-1.16

+2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

-1.70

+2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.77

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

-0.91

+1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.30

-1.62

+3.92

AHTPX vs. QIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AHTPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the QIS Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHTPX and QIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AHTPXQISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

-1.16

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-0.80

+1.65

Correlation

The correlation between AHTPX and QIS is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AHTPX vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison

AHTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than QIS's 1.65% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
AHTPX
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund
7.73%7.98%4.80%3.63%5.07%18.73%0.54%4.51%
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
1.65%3.37%1.07%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AHTPX vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -52.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHTPX and QIS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AHTPXQISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-52.12%

+32.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-51.77%

+41.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.92%

-52.11%

+45.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-11.42%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

29.06%

-24.92%

Volatility

AHTPX vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) is 3.73%, while Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that AHTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AHTPXQISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

11.26%

-7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

25.31%

-16.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

40.80%

-29.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.70%

26.91%

-17.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.01%

26.91%

-17.90%