AHTPX vs. QIS
AHTPX (American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund) and QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) are both funds - AHTPX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by American Beacon, while QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify. Over the past 3 years, AHTPX returned 8.30%/yr vs -26.24%/yr for QIS. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AHTPX charges 1.41%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for QIS.
Performance
AHTPX vs. QIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHTPX achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than QIS's -36.27% return.
AHTPX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 18.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.69%
QIS
- 1D
- -6.37%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -36.80%
- YTD
- -36.27%
- 1Y
- -51.61%
- 3Y*
- -26.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $7.85K | $6.92K | $24.22K |
AHTPX vs. QIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund | 6.55% | 7.76% | 6.73% | 8.95% |
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | -36.27% | -38.02% | 0.19% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AHTPX and QIS is 0.10, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AHTPX vs. QIS — Risk / Return Rank
AHTPX
QIS
AHTPX vs. QIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AHTPX | QIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.77 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | -0.95 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | -1.65 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AHTPX vs. QIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHTPX drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum QIS drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHTPX and QIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AHTPX | QIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -62.82% | +43.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -54.47% | +47.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.89% | -62.82% | +49.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -62.64% | +58.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -16.11% | +10.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 31.32% | -28.38% |
Volatility
AHTPX vs. QIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) is 2.59%, while Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that AHTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AHTPX | QIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 15.75% | -13.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.47% | 33.30% | -26.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.78% | 40.47% | -30.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.65% | 30.29% | -20.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 30.29% | -21.35% |
AHTPX vs. QIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHTPX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than QIS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AHTPX vs. QIS - Dividend Comparison
AHTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than QIS's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund | 7.49% | 7.98% | 4.80% | 3.63% | 5.07% | 18.73% | 0.54% | 4.51% |
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | 2.14% | 3.37% | 1.07% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AHTPX and QIS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QIS has higher volatility (15.75%) compared to AHTPX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AHTPX dropped -19.23% vs QIS's -62.82%.
AHTPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AHTPX and QIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer