AHTPX vs. GBFFX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX).
AHTPX is managed by American Beacon. It was launched on Dec 30, 2018. GBFFX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Jun 14, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHTPX or GBFFX.
Correlation
The correlation between AHTPX and GBFFX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AHTPX:
-0.60
GBFFX:
0.58
AHTPX:
-0.62
GBFFX:
0.80
AHTPX:
0.91
GBFFX:
1.11
AHTPX:
-0.30
GBFFX:
0.69
AHTPX:
-1.25
GBFFX:
1.66
AHTPX:
4.80%
GBFFX:
3.02%
AHTPX:
10.86%
GBFFX:
9.05%
AHTPX:
-27.86%
GBFFX:
-32.38%
AHTPX:
-18.01%
GBFFX:
-1.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHTPX achieves a -6.26% return, which is significantly lower than GBFFX's 5.34% return.
AHTPX
-6.26%
2.03%
-7.34%
-6.44%
0.69%
N/A
GBFFX
5.34%
6.43%
2.69%
5.18%
6.91%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AHTPX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GBFFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AHTPX vs. GBFFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AHTPX
GBFFX
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) and GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Dividend Comparison
AHTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than GBFFX's 5.72% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHTPX American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund | 5.13% | 4.81% | 3.63% | 3.19% | 7.61% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GBFFX GMO Benchmark-Free Fund | 5.72% | 6.02% | 5.72% | 5.48% | 4.60% | 3.32% | 4.00% | 3.91% | 2.90% | 2.73% | 6.67% |
Drawdowns
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHTPX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum GBFFX drawdown of -32.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHTPX and GBFFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AHTPX vs. GBFFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund (AHTPX) is 0.59%, while GMO Benchmark-Free Fund (GBFFX) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that AHTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with AHTPX or GBFFX
Recent discussions
Feature Request: Screener alerts
Scott Allen
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
technical support
Marcus Crahan