PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
AHT.L vs. FERG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AHT.L and FERG is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

AHT.L vs. FERG

Last updated May 31, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Ferguson plc (FERG).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHT.L or FERG.

Performance

AHT.L vs. FERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Ferguson plc (FERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AHT.L:

-0.71

FERG:

-0.30

Sortino Ratio

AHT.L:

-0.81

FERG:

-0.22

Omega Ratio

AHT.L:

0.89

FERG:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

AHT.L:

-0.53

FERG:

-0.29

Martin Ratio

AHT.L:

-1.13

FERG:

-0.59

Ulcer Index

AHT.L:

19.86%

FERG:

16.22%

Daily Std Dev

AHT.L:

31.70%

FERG:

32.24%

Max Drawdown

AHT.L:

-98.94%

FERG:

-55.35%

Current Drawdown

AHT.L:

-31.87%

FERG:

-17.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AHT.L:

£18.62B

FERG:

$36.74B

EPS

AHT.L:

£2.57

FERG:

$8.17

PE Ratio

AHT.L:

16.73

FERG:

22.41

PEG Ratio

AHT.L:

1.23

FERG:

1.43

PS Ratio

AHT.L:

1.71

FERG:

1.23

PB Ratio

AHT.L:

3.27

FERG:

6.69

Total Revenue (TTM)

AHT.L:

£8.26B

FERG:

$22.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AHT.L:

£7.29B

FERG:

$6.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

AHT.L:

£3.86B

FERG:

$2.16B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AHT.L achieves a -12.18% return, which is significantly lower than FERG's 5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT.L has outperformed FERG with an annualized return of 15.95%, while FERG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.43% annualized return.

AHT.L

YTD

-12.18%

1M

8.65%

6M

-30.68%

1Y

-22.50%

3Y*

3.07%

5Y*

14.20%

10Y*

15.95%

FERG

YTD

5.59%

1M

7.47%

6M

-14.72%

1Y

-9.58%

3Y*

17.59%

5Y*

21.08%

10Y*

14.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Ashtead Group plc

Ferguson plc

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AHT.L vs. FERG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AHT.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AHT.L is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AHT.L is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AHT.L is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AHT.L is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AHT.L is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AHT.L is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
FERG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FERG is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FERG is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FERG is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FERG is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FERG is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FERG is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AHT.L vs. FERG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Ferguson plc (FERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AHT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the FERG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT.L and FERG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AHT.L vs. FERG - Dividend Comparison

AHT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than FERG's 1.78% yield.

TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AHT.L
Ashtead Group plc		2.23%1.62%1.45%1.41%0.71%1.18%1.66%2.02%1.38%1.42%1.36%1.00%
FERG
Ferguson plc		1.78%1.84%1.57%2.76%2.34%2.33%2.27%9.77%1.99%2.15%2.77%2.59%

Drawdowns

AHT.L vs. FERG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AHT.L drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than FERG's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT.L and FERG.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AHT.L vs. FERG - Volatility Comparison

Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Ferguson plc (FERG) at 7.03%. This indicates that AHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FERG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

AHT.L vs. FERG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Group plc and Ferguson plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
2.57B
6.87B
(AHT.L) Total Revenue
(FERG) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AHT.L values in GBp, FERG values in USD

AHT.L vs. FERG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ashtead Group plc and Ferguson plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
88.3%
29.7%
(AHT.L) Gross Margin
(FERG) Gross Margin
AHT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported a gross profit of 2.27B and revenue of 2.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.3%.

FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 6.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

AHT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported an operating income of 549.80M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.4%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 410.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

AHT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported a net income of 309.70M and revenue of 2.57B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 276.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.