Correlation
The correlation between AHT.L and CTAS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
AHT.L vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHT.L or CTAS.
Performance
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AHT.L:
-0.54
CTAS:
1.00
AHT.L:
-0.53
CTAS:
1.38
AHT.L:
0.93
CTAS:
1.22
AHT.L:
-0.39
CTAS:
1.25
AHT.L:
-0.79
CTAS:
3.19
AHT.L:
21.06%
CTAS:
7.71%
AHT.L:
31.72%
CTAS:
25.01%
AHT.L:
-98.94%
CTAS:
-65.32%
AHT.L:
-30.56%
CTAS:
-3.96%
Fundamentals
AHT.L:
£18.99B
CTAS:
$88.29B
AHT.L:
£2.58
CTAS:
$4.31
AHT.L:
17.02
CTAS:
50.73
AHT.L:
1.28
CTAS:
3.87
AHT.L:
1.79
CTAS:
8.70
AHT.L:
3.36
CTAS:
19.23
AHT.L:
£10.79B
CTAS:
$7.67B
AHT.L:
£9.50B
CTAS:
$3.85B
AHT.L:
£3.86B
CTAS:
$2.17B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHT.L achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 20.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT.L has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 16.22%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.24% annualized return.
AHT.L
-10.49%
4.77%
-11.65%
-16.54%
11.26%
11.60%
16.22%
CTAS
20.12%
-1.64%
17.40%
24.38%
35.86%
27.75%
27.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AHT.L vs. CTAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AHT.L
CTAS
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
AHT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than CTAS's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT.L Ashtead Group plc | 2.19% | 1.62% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.18% | 1.66% | 2.02% | 1.38% | 1.42% | 1.36% | 1.00% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.71% | 0.80% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHT.L drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT.L and CTAS.
Loading data...
Volatility
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 3.18%. This indicates that AHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Group plc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison
AHT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported a gross profit of 2.21B and revenue of 2.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.4%.
CTAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.
AHT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported an operating income of 611.30M and revenue of 2.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.2%.
CTAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
AHT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ashtead Group plc reported a net income of 311.30M and revenue of 2.53B, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
CTAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.