AHT.L vs. CTAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHT.L or CTAS.
Correlation
The correlation between AHT.L and CTAS is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AHT.L:
-0.14
CTAS:
2.33
AHT.L:
0.02
CTAS:
3.36
AHT.L:
1.00
CTAS:
1.48
AHT.L:
-0.18
CTAS:
4.82
AHT.L:
-0.50
CTAS:
20.40
AHT.L:
8.72%
CTAS:
2.30%
AHT.L:
31.11%
CTAS:
20.18%
AHT.L:
-98.94%
CTAS:
-65.32%
AHT.L:
-19.28%
CTAS:
-9.75%
Fundamentals
AHT.L:
£22.48B
CTAS:
$84.04B
AHT.L:
£2.79
CTAS:
$3.96
AHT.L:
18.23
CTAS:
52.62
AHT.L:
1.22
CTAS:
4.46
AHT.L:
£10.98B
CTAS:
$7.38B
AHT.L:
£9.73B
CTAS:
$3.57B
AHT.L:
£5.00B
CTAS:
$1.98B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHT.L achieves a -3.94% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's 36.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT.L has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 17.87%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 27.65% annualized return.
AHT.L
-3.94%
-16.84%
-3.44%
-3.34%
17.79%
17.87%
CTAS
36.75%
-5.46%
15.43%
47.09%
25.91%
27.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison
AHT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than CTAS's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT.L Ashtead Group plc | 1.55% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.18% | 1.66% | 2.02% | 1.38% | 1.42% | 1.36% | 1.00% | 0.99% |
CTAS Cintas Corporation | 0.71% | 0.83% | 0.93% | 0.77% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.22% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.15% | 2.17% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHT.L drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT.L and CTAS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison
Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 8.22%. This indicates that AHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AHT.L vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Group plc and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities