AGTHX vs. FNCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX).
AGTHX is managed by Equity. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973. FNCMX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | -7.11% | 19.73% | 28.02% | 37.22% | -30.75% | 19.32% | 37.83% | 28.16% | -3.15% | 26.14% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | -5.91% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | 28.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGTHX achieves a -7.11% return, which is significantly lower than FNCMX's -5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AGTHX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 14.44%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.99% annualized return.
AGTHX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- YTD
- -7.11%
- 6M
- -6.60%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.68%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
FNCMX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 24.82%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGTHX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AGTHX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank
AGTHX
FNCMX
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGTHX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.12 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.72 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 2.04 | -0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 7.40 | -2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGTHX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.12 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.49 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.77 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.54 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGTHX and FNCMX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
AGTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than FNCMX's 0.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A | 11.51% | 10.69% | 8.99% | 7.40% | 4.05% | 8.18% | 4.30% | 7.15% | 11.99% | 7.03% | 6.61% | 8.87% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.55% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGTHX drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGTHX and FNCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGTHX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -55.08% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -13.01% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.38% | -35.64% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.38% | -35.64% | -0.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -8.62% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.23% | -7.91% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.65% | +0.04% |
Volatility
AGTHX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) have volatilities of 6.78% and 7.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGTHX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 7.07% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 13.09% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 23.34% | -2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 22.47% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 22.00% | -2.36% |