PortfoliosLab logo
AGO vs. ARES
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AGO and ARES is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AGO vs. ARES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGO:

0.49

ARES:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

AGO:

0.87

ARES:

0.82

Omega Ratio

AGO:

1.11

ARES:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

AGO:

0.60

ARES:

0.44

Martin Ratio

AGO:

2.07

ARES:

1.41

Ulcer Index

AGO:

6.30%

ARES:

12.57%

Daily Std Dev

AGO:

26.48%

ARES:

41.13%

Max Drawdown

AGO:

-90.18%

ARES:

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

AGO:

-10.56%

ARES:

-15.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGO:

$4.18B

ARES:

$53.85B

EPS

AGO:

$8.42

ARES:

$1.71

PE Ratio

AGO:

9.99

ARES:

96.43

PEG Ratio

AGO:

2.52

ARES:

0.63

PS Ratio

AGO:

4.73

ARES:

12.62

PB Ratio

AGO:

0.74

ARES:

12.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGO:

$956.00M

ARES:

$4.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGO:

$826.00M

ARES:

$2.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGO:

$385.00M

ARES:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGO achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly higher than ARES's -5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AGO has underperformed ARES with an annualized return of 13.46%, while ARES has yielded a comparatively higher 29.27% annualized return.


AGO

YTD

-5.13%

1M

-4.20%

6M

-8.59%

1Y

12.99%

3Y*

15.04%

5Y*

29.08%

10Y*

13.46%

ARES

YTD

-5.78%

1M

8.50%

6M

-5.14%

1Y

18.82%

3Y*

36.63%

5Y*

38.71%

10Y*

29.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Assured Guaranty Ltd.

Ares Management Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGO vs. ARES — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGO is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGO is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGO is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGO is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGO is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGO is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ARES
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARES is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARES is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARES is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARES is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARES is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARES is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGO vs. ARES - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) and Ares Management Corporation (ARES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the ARES Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGO and ARES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AGO vs. ARES - Dividend Comparison

AGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than ARES's 2.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AGO
Assured Guaranty Ltd.
1.53%1.38%1.50%1.61%1.75%2.54%1.47%1.67%1.69%1.38%1.82%1.69%
ARES
Ares Management Corporation
2.36%2.10%2.59%3.57%2.31%3.40%3.59%7.50%6.30%4.32%6.81%2.45%

Drawdowns

AGO vs. ARES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGO drawdown since its inception was -90.18%, which is greater than ARES's maximum drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGO and ARES.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AGO vs. ARES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Assured Guaranty Ltd. (AGO) is 5.37%, while Ares Management Corporation (ARES) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that AGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AGO vs. ARES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Ares Management Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
345.00M
1.09B
(AGO) Total Revenue
(ARES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGO vs. ARES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Assured Guaranty Ltd. and Ares Management Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
87.0%
39.7%
(AGO) Gross Margin
(ARES) Gross Margin
AGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a gross profit of 300.00M and revenue of 345.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.0%.

ARES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a gross profit of 431.68M and revenue of 1.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

AGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported an operating income of 176.00M and revenue of 345.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.0%.

ARES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported an operating income of 67.52M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

AGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Assured Guaranty Ltd. reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 345.00M, resulting in a net margin of 51.0%.

ARES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ares Management Corporation reported a net income of 123.50M and revenue of 1.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.