AGM vs. VRTS
AGM (Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation) and VRTS (Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — AGM in Credit Services, VRTS in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, AGM returned 21.01%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for VRTS. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AGM vs. VRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than VRTS's -10.86% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has outperformed VRTS with an annualized return of 21.01%, while VRTS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.
AGM
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- -3.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.01%
VRTS
- 1D
- -4.31%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- -10.86%
- 6M
- -10.87%
- 1Y
- -12.57%
- 3Y*
- -7.17%
- 5Y*
- -10.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
AGM vs. VRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 0.57% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | -10.86% | -22.12% | -5.56% | 30.90% | -33.50% | 38.98% | 82.52% | 56.62% | -29.81% | -0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between AGM and VRTS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009 | 0.42 |
The correlation between AGM and VRTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AGM:
$24.06
VRTS:
$16.98
AGM:
7.26
VRTS:
8.30
AGM:
1.13
VRTS:
1.21
AGM:
$1.35B
VRTS:
$799.77M
AGM:
$295.93M
VRTS:
$646.06M
AGM:
$192.59M
VRTS:
$384.75M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGM vs. VRTS — Risk / Return Rank
AGM
VRTS
AGM vs. VRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.96 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.32 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -0.57 | +0.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | -0.37 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | -0.29 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.23 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.42 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
AGM vs. VRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, which is greater than VRTS's maximum drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and VRTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.63% | -74.36% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -38.95% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.54% | -46.59% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.54% | -55.50% | +22.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.30% | -58.70% | +5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.22% | -49.15% | +33.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.87% | -31.46% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.82% | 22.26% | -5.44% |
Volatility
AGM vs. VRTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 9.34%, while Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 10.57% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.67% | 26.14% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.97% | 34.18% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.87% | 35.88% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.50% | 38.59% | -4.09% |
Dividends
AGM vs. VRTS - Dividend Comparison
AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than VRTS's 6.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 3.49% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 6.71% | 5.61% | 3.60% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.39% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.53% |
Financials
AGM vs. VRTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGM vs. VRTS - Profitability Comparison
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VRTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 131.82M and revenue of 186.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VRTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.23M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 51.83M and revenue of 415.96M, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
VRTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 7.13M and revenue of 186.04M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AGM and VRTS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTS has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to AGM (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGM dropped -94.63% vs VRTS's -74.36%.
AGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.12 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AGM and VRTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer