AGM vs. VRTS
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS).
Performance
AGM vs. VRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGM vs. VRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | -14.60% | -7.96% | 6.08% | 74.61% | -5.83% | 72.62% | -6.60% | 43.16% | -20.38% | 39.64% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | -16.44% | -22.12% | -5.56% | 30.90% | -33.50% | 38.98% | 82.52% | 56.62% | -29.81% | -0.99% |
Fundamentals
AGM:
$24.96
VRTS:
$20.04
AGM:
5.94
VRTS:
6.71
AGM:
0.67
VRTS:
1.09
AGM:
$1.61B
VRTS:
$849.51M
AGM:
$0.00
VRTS:
$335.56M
AGM:
$0.00
VRTS:
$343.68M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a -14.60% return, which is significantly higher than VRTS's -16.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has outperformed VRTS with an annualized return of 18.52%, while VRTS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.83% annualized return.
AGM
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- YTD
- -14.60%
- 6M
- -10.00%
- 1Y
- -18.10%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 18.52%
VRTS
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -16.44%
- 6M
- -27.19%
- 1Y
- -17.61%
- 3Y*
- -7.07%
- 5Y*
- -7.78%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGM vs. VRTS — Risk / Return Rank
AGM
VRTS
AGM vs. VRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | -0.49 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | -0.48 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 0.94 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | -0.46 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.98 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | -0.49 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | -0.22 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.23 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between AGM and VRTS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AGM vs. VRTS - Dividend Comparison
AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than VRTS's 6.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 4.11% | 3.42% | 2.84% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 6.92% | 5.61% | 3.60% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.39% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
AGM vs. VRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, which is greater than VRTS's maximum drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and VRTS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.63% | -74.36% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.94% | -38.95% | +7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.54% | -55.50% | +22.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.30% | -58.70% | +5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.00% | -52.34% | +24.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.93% | -31.27% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.57% | 18.45% | -2.88% |
Volatility
AGM vs. VRTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 8.44%, while Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGM | VRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 9.68% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.80% | 24.82% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.95% | 36.18% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.03% | 35.66% | -5.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.64% | 38.96% | -4.32% |
Financials
AGM vs. VRTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGM vs. VRTS - Profitability Comparison
AGM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of -284.04M and revenue of 401.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -70.7%.
VRTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 208.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
AGM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of -195.25M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -48.6%.
VRTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.82M and revenue of 208.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
AGM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 23.00M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
VRTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 35.45M and revenue of 208.02M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.