AGM vs. VRTS
Compare and contrast key facts about Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGM or VRTS.
Key characteristics
| AGM | VRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.57% | -2.82% |
| 1Y Return | 45.10% | 28.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 27.81% | -0.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.88% | 17.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 21.99% | 4.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.52 | 0.92 |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.15% | 30.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -94.63% | -74.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.14% | -24.62% |
Fundamentals
| AGM | VRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.92B | $1.61B |
| EPS | $15.81 | $17.71 |
| PE Ratio | 11.59 | 12.72 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.64 | 0.62 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $346.59M | $845.27M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $305.24M | $402.51M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $16.39M | $215.24M |
Correlation
The correlation between AGM and VRTS is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AGM vs. VRTS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AGM achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than VRTS's -2.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM has outperformed VRTS with an annualized return of 21.99%, while VRTS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.99% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGM vs. VRTS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AGM vs. VRTS - Dividend Comparison
AGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than VRTS's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation | 2.46% | 2.30% | 3.37% | 2.84% | 4.31% | 3.35% | 3.84% | 1.84% | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.85% | 1.40% |
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 3.05% | 2.83% | 3.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.91% | 2.39% | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGM vs. VRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGM drawdown since its inception was -94.63%, which is greater than VRTS's maximum drawdown of -74.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM and VRTS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AGM vs. VRTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is 7.73%, while Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. (VRTS) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that AGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AGM vs. VRTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Virtus Investment Partners, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities