PortfoliosLab logo
AGM-A vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AGM-A and COST is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AGM-A vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGM-A:

0.05

COST:

0.59

Sortino Ratio

AGM-A:

0.36

COST:

1.11

Omega Ratio

AGM-A:

1.05

COST:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

AGM-A:

0.05

COST:

0.94

Martin Ratio

AGM-A:

0.11

COST:

2.61

Ulcer Index

AGM-A:

12.51%

COST:

6.19%

Daily Std Dev

AGM-A:

44.08%

COST:

22.52%

Max Drawdown

AGM-A:

-95.31%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

AGM-A:

-15.99%

COST:

-9.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AGM-A:

$1.96B

COST:

$439.14B

EPS

AGM-A:

$16.17

COST:

$17.52

PE Ratio

AGM-A:

8.35

COST:

56.18

PEG Ratio

AGM-A:

1.12

COST:

5.26

PS Ratio

AGM-A:

5.48

COST:

1.63

PB Ratio

AGM-A:

1.32

COST:

16.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

AGM-A:

$784.95M

COST:

$268.78B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AGM-A:

$499.84M

COST:

$35.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

AGM-A:

$845.76M

COST:

$11.58B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGM-A achieves a -7.10% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, AGM-A has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 21.11%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.57% annualized return.


AGM-A

YTD

-7.10%

1M

-5.03%

6M

-12.40%

1Y

1.74%

3Y*

18.73%

5Y*

21.35%

10Y*

21.11%

COST

YTD

6.96%

1M

-4.69%

6M

-0.20%

1Y

13.23%

3Y*

31.66%

5Y*

28.80%

10Y*

23.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGM-A vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGM-A
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGM-A is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGM-A is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGM-A is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGM-A is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGM-A is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGM-A is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGM-A vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGM-A Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGM-A and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AGM-A vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

AGM-A's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than COST's 0.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AGM-A
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
4.29%3.76%2.80%3.96%2.97%4.90%3.76%4.07%1.98%1.70%2.42%2.46%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.49%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

AGM-A vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGM-A drawdown since its inception was -95.31%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGM-A and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AGM-A vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM-A) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.16%. This indicates that AGM-A's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AGM-A vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
384.79M
63.21B
(AGM-A) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AGM-A vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
24.5%
13.0%
(AGM-A) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
AGM-A - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of 94.32M and revenue of 384.79M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.21B and revenue of 63.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.0%.

AGM-A - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of 64.81M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.53B and revenue of 63.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

AGM-A - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 49.65M and revenue of 384.79M, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 63.21B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.