Correlation
The correlation between AGGU.L and SWRD.L is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L).
AGGU.L and SWRD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AGGU.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. SWRD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Feb 28, 2019. Both AGGU.L and SWRD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AGGU.L or SWRD.L.
Performance
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AGGU.L:
1.28
SWRD.L:
0.71
AGGU.L:
1.78
SWRD.L:
1.10
AGGU.L:
1.23
SWRD.L:
1.16
AGGU.L:
0.66
SWRD.L:
0.75
AGGU.L:
5.04
SWRD.L:
3.21
AGGU.L:
1.01%
SWRD.L:
3.93%
AGGU.L:
4.14%
SWRD.L:
16.44%
AGGU.L:
-15.55%
SWRD.L:
-34.10%
AGGU.L:
-2.23%
SWRD.L:
-1.34%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGGU.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than SWRD.L's 5.13% return.
AGGU.L
2.09%
1.20%
2.15%
5.10%
3.63%
-0.05%
N/A
SWRD.L
5.13%
2.55%
5.04%
12.59%
17.05%
13.68%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AGGU.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AGGU.L
SWRD.L
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) and SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AGGU.L nor SWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGGU.L drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum SWRD.L drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGGU.L and SWRD.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
AGGU.L vs. SWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (AGGU.L) is 0.82%, while SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF (SWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that AGGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...