PortfoliosLab logo
AGBP.L vs. IAGG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AGBP.L and IAGG is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AGBP.L:

0.42

IAGG:

1.96

Sortino Ratio

AGBP.L:

0.58

IAGG:

2.94

Omega Ratio

AGBP.L:

1.08

IAGG:

1.37

Calmar Ratio

AGBP.L:

0.13

IAGG:

1.23

Martin Ratio

AGBP.L:

1.19

IAGG:

10.91

Ulcer Index

AGBP.L:

1.61%

IAGG:

0.58%

Daily Std Dev

AGBP.L:

4.64%

IAGG:

3.19%

Max Drawdown

AGBP.L:

-19.38%

IAGG:

-13.88%

Current Drawdown

AGBP.L:

-12.86%

IAGG:

-0.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGBP.L achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than IAGG's 2.20% return.


AGBP.L

YTD

0.45%

1M

1.19%

6M

0.51%

1Y

1.92%

3Y*

0.55%

5Y*

-2.50%

10Y*

N/A

IAGG

YTD

2.20%

1M

0.77%

6M

1.98%

1Y

6.20%

3Y*

4.77%

5Y*

0.68%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGBP.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IAGG's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AGBP.L vs. IAGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGBP.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGBP.L is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGBP.L is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGBP.L is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGBP.L is 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGBP.L is 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGBP.L is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

IAGG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IAGG is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IAGG is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IAGG is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IAGG is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IAGG is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IAGG is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) and iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AGBP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the IAGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGBP.L and IAGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Dividend Comparison

AGBP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than IAGG's 4.18% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGBP.L
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.89%2.59%91.82%156.06%127.45%153.09%164.90%97.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IAGG
iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF
4.18%4.28%3.55%2.28%1.16%1.95%2.82%3.02%1.74%1.56%0.13%

Drawdowns

AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGBP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, which is greater than IAGG's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGBP.L and IAGG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AGBP.L vs. IAGG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (AGBP.L) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to iShares Core International Aggregate Bond ETF (IAGG) at 0.75%. This indicates that AGBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...