PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AG vs. F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AGF
YTD Return2.67%-2.57%
1Y Return38.60%20.95%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.94%-11.31%
5Y Return (Ann)-10.01%9.56%
10Y Return (Ann)1.89%2.09%
Sharpe Ratio0.630.55
Sortino Ratio1.300.92
Omega Ratio1.151.14
Calmar Ratio0.460.37
Martin Ratio1.821.35
Ulcer Index20.87%15.15%
Daily Std Dev60.76%37.14%
Max Drawdown-90.20%-95.49%
Current Drawdown-75.16%-46.19%

Fundamentals


AGF
Market Cap$1.90B$44.11B
EPS-$0.26$0.88
PEG Ratio0.000.64
Total Revenue (TTM)$377.82M$182.74B
Gross Profit (TTM)$22.29M$14.12B
EBITDA (TTM)$63.36M$8.79B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between AG and F is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AG vs. F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly higher than F's -2.57% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed F with an annualized return of 1.89%, while F has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-13.35%
-8.15%
AG
F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AG vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AG, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AG, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AG, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AG, currently valued at 0.46, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.46
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AG, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.82
F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for F, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for F, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for F, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for F, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.37
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for F, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.35

AG vs. F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AG Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is comparable to the F Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AG and F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.63
0.55
AG
F

Dividends

AG vs. F - Dividend Comparison

AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than F's 7.03% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.28%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
F
Ford Motor Company
7.03%10.25%4.30%0.48%1.71%6.45%9.54%5.20%7.01%4.26%3.23%2.59%

Drawdowns

AG vs. F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -95.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-75.16%
-46.19%
AG
F

Volatility

AG vs. F - Volatility Comparison

First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a higher volatility of 19.99% compared to Ford Motor Company (F) at 12.53%. This indicates that AG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.99%
12.53%
AG
F

Financials

AG vs. F - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items