AG vs. AGCO
AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) and AGCO (AGCO Corporation) are both stocks. AG operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while AGCO operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AG returned 0.44%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for AGCO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AG vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than AGCO's 9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 0.44%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.50% annualized return.
AG
- 1D
- -4.97%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- 6M
- -12.02%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 89.70%
- 3Y*
- 43.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 0.44%
AGCO
- 1D
- -3.86%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- 6M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 5.83%
- 3Y*
- -2.78%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
AG vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | -1.14% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 9.55% | 12.85% | -20.33% | -7.90% | 24.99% | 16.16% | 34.77% | 40.02% | -21.30% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between AG and AGCO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2010 | 0.20 |
The correlation between AG and AGCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (10 years) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AG:
$8.12B
AGCO:
$8.24B
AG:
$0.59
AGCO:
$10.45
AG:
27.68
AGCO:
10.88
AG:
0.49
AGCO:
0.42
AG:
5.46
AGCO:
0.81
AG:
2.84
AGCO:
1.92
AG:
$1.49B
AGCO:
$10.37B
AG:
$646.49M
AGCO:
$2.58B
AG:
$824.25M
AGCO:
$984.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AG vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank
AG
AGCO
AG vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.06 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.26 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.83 | 0.51 | +3.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AG vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than AGCO's maximum drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and AGCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -83.96% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.88% | -22.42% | -28.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.88% | -43.50% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.96% | -43.50% | -27.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.82% | -54.07% | -26.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.56% | -18.83% | -29.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.12% | -29.71% | -29.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.51% | 11.57% | +11.94% |
Volatility
AG vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison
First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a higher volatility of 23.84% compared to AGCO Corporation (AGCO) at 10.04%. This indicates that AG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AG | AGCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.84% | 10.04% | +13.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.73% | 25.30% | +33.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.78% | 33.95% | +40.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.00% | 35.17% | +26.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.98% | 35.01% | +26.97% |
Dividends
AG vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison
AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than AGCO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.22% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AGCO AGCO Corporation | 1.03% | 1.11% | 3.92% | 5.03% | 3.91% | 4.10% | 0.62% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.78% | 0.90% | 1.06% |
Financials
AG vs. AGCO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and AGCO Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AG vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison
AG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
AGCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.
AG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.
AGCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
AG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.
AGCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AG and AGCO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (23.84%) compared to AGCO (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AG dropped -90.20% vs AGCO's -83.96%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AG and AGCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer