PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AG vs. AGCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AG vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AG achieves a 18.81% return, which is significantly higher than AGCO's 15.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AG has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 5.39%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


AG

1D
0.00%
1M
3.60%
YTD
18.81%
6M
31.78%
1Y
172.15%
3Y*
50.17%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
5.39%

AGCO

1D
0.21%
1M
4.91%
YTD
15.44%
6M
13.84%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AG vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
18.81%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
15.44%12.85%-20.33%-7.90%24.99%16.16%34.77%40.02%-21.30%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AG and AGCO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AG:

$9.92B

AGCO:

$8.71B

EPS

AG:

$0.60

AGCO:

$10.42

PE Ratio

AG:

33.16

AGCO:

11.51

PEG Ratio

AG:

0.59

AGCO:

0.45

PS Ratio

AG:

6.54

AGCO:

0.86

PB Ratio

AG:

3.41

AGCO:

2.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

AG:

$1.49B

AGCO:

$10.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AG:

$646.49M

AGCO:

$2.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

AG:

$824.25M

AGCO:

$984.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AG vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AGCO
AGCO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AGCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AGCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AG vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGAGCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.14

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

0.97

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.92

2.08

+6.84

AG vs. AGCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AG Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the AGCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AG and AGCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGAGCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

0.64

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.01

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.30

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.24

-0.20

Drawdowns

AG vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AG drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than AGCO's maximum drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AG and AGCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGAGCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-83.96%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.92%

-22.23%

-20.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.92%

-43.50%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.89%

-43.50%

-33.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.82%

-54.07%

-26.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.18%

-14.46%

-23.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.20%

-29.74%

-29.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.38%

10.30%

+9.08%

Volatility

AG vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison

First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a higher volatility of 22.56% compared to AGCO Corporation (AGCO) at 10.05%. This indicates that AG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGAGCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.56%

10.05%

+12.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.00%

23.81%

+32.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.21%

33.32%

+39.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.33%

35.08%

+26.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.82%

35.04%

+26.78%

Dividends

AG vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison

AG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than AGCO's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.18%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
0.98%1.11%3.92%5.03%3.91%4.10%0.62%0.82%1.08%0.78%0.90%1.06%

Financials

AG vs. AGCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Majestic Silver Corp. and AGCO Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
470.07M
2.34B
(AG) Total Revenue
(AGCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AG vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First Majestic Silver Corp. and AGCO Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
55.3%
24.8%
Portfolio components
AG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a gross profit of 259.78M and revenue of 470.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

AGCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

AG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported an operating income of 232.71M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.5%.

AGCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

AG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Majestic Silver Corp. reported a net income of 126.32M and revenue of 470.07M, resulting in a net margin of 26.9%.

AGCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AG and AGCO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (22.56%) compared to AGCO (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AG dropped -90.20% vs AGCO's -83.96%.

AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AG and AGCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer